Islam is today trying to pathetically hide itself - much like the
muslim Al-Qaeda terrorist Dzokhar Tsarnaev who was fueled by Saudi
sponsored dreams of an islamist Khorasan
Remember that the absolute majority of deadly violence (terrorism) is
committed by muslims and demanded by the Koran. Still, most of muslim
street jihadism isn't even icluded. If you have a random sample of
deranged people a certain percentage will commit violent crimes.
However, if half of the sample is spiced with Koranic hatred against
"infidels" then it's absolutely self-evident that this group will end up
with even more violence! Klevius feels embarrassed to even mention such
a matter of course but today we have ended up with a situation where
pure visible naked evil has to be labeled as such - and even then people
keep saying: But it's a religion - it can't be evil!
Are you equally ignorant and sex segregated as this muslim terroris's mother!
It was islam that more than 1,000 years ago gathered so many African
slaves in what is now Iraq that a rebellion icluded more than half a
million slaves.
It was islam that sanctioned African slavers to take as much as several
tens of thousands of African slaves in a single pilgrimage to Mecca long
before a single slave had entered the Americas.
Just a brief study of islam's history reveals an almost incomprehensible
amount of slaves and suffering in the name of Allah, Mohammed and the
Koran. As Klevius has repeatedly stated, we do need an islamic approach
to history - not a cover up and whitewashing. Without understanding
islam's deep rooted evilness one cannot make sense of the history of
people contaminated by islam.
Jérôme Maurand, a 16th century French priest: "To see so many
poor Christians, and especially so many little boys and girls [enslaved]
caused a very great pity. The tears, wailings and cries of these poor
Lipariotes, the father regarding his son and the mother her daughter...
weeping while leaving their own city in order to be brought into slavery
by those dogs who seemed like rapacious wolves amidst timid lambs. The
old ones who hid in the cathedral were stripped and cut up while still
alive just 'out of spite'. When we asked these Turks why they treated
these poor Christians with such cruelty, they replied that such behavior
'had very great virtue'".
No other ideology comes even close. This is why OIC and other islam supporters so eagerly try to hide it!
The “common creed” rhetorics is what makes America (and other places) vulnerable to evil islam.
Obama: "Americans refuse to be terrorized".
Klevius: Yes, by shutting their eyes.
If you are appalled by slavery, genocides and rapetivism - then you
should be deeply ashamed of islam, because those are the main traces of
islam in history!
OIC wants to falsify and cover up islam's true
slavery/genocide/rapetivism origin and history (i.e. what historically
constitutes the worst ideological crime ever against humanity)
Klevius brief history of islam:
Origin of islam
The parasitic source code of islam: Slavery+"infidel" racism+
sex segregated rapetivism+anti human rights Sharia/apostasy ban.
Origin of the Vikings (Klevius' evil forefathers)
Cathedral Catholicism
A product of the European defense against islam
Renaissance
The recovering from islamist jihadism and a slowly emerging
understanding of the value of individual freedom as opposed to slavery.
Enlightenment
A slowly emerging understanding that religion is a dead end. Especially
the excesses in Catholicism - which in turn was the result of islam's
attacks on Europe.
Protestantism against Catholicism and the birth of industrialization and the modern (aka "Western") world civilization
When England eventually got rid of Catholicism 1688 the road was open
for enlightened humans to use their individual creativity for industrial
production.
Negative Human Rights declaration 1948
After the fall of the last muslim stronghold, the Ottoman "empire" (it
fell as a result of the abolition of slavery), Europe again had to face a
period of war 1914-1945 before resettling with a formula, Human
Rights, that ended the theoretical possibility of evil racism and
sexism. That the negative Human Rights were contaminated with positive
so called Stalin rights should not in any sense disprove the former
which are free from impositions.
The laughable oxymoron "islamic science", how could anyone possibly take
it seriously?! Unless by ignorance out of whitewashing and brainwashing
of course!
The oxymoron "islamic science" is utter defamation of science, and is rooted in ignorance about the origin of islam!
Klevius science tutorial for Seyyid Hossein Nasr and others
Seyyid Hossein Nasr (“professor” of Islamic Studies at Georgetown
University) at MIT Islamic Students Association (sponsored by the
Pakistan Study Group, the MIT Muslim Students Association and “other
groups”): “Science has its own world-view. No science is created in
a vacuum. Science arose under particular circumstances in the West with
certain philosophical presumptions about the nature of reality. As soon
as you say, m, f, v, and a, that is, the simple parameters of classical
physics, you have chosen to look at reality from a certain point of
view. There is no mass, there is no force out there like that chair or
table. These are particularly abstract concepts which grew in the
seventeenth century on the basis of a particular concept of space,
matter and motion which Newton developed. The historians and
philosophers of science in the last twenty [or] thirty years have shown
beyond the scepter of doubt that modern science has its own world view.
It is not at all value free; nor is it a purely objective science of
reality irrespective of the subject you study. It is based upon the
imposition of certain categories upon the study of nature, with a
remarkable success in the study of certain things, and also a remarkable
lack of success [in others], depending on what you are looking at.”
Klevius: Listen to this utter crap! “
Science has its own world-view. No science is created in a vacuum”.
Two cardinal flaws in just twelve words! Does this muslim fella also
believe that "the Western interpretation" 2+2=4 has a corresponding
Sharia compliant islamic version?! The choice to look at reality from a
certain point of view isn't science, just like what you choose to do
with your power tool isn't the power tool!
OK, science doesn’t have its own world-view, that’s for sure. If it had
it wouldn't be science anymore. This is the very definition of science.
Just as Negative Human Rights don’t have a world-view either, simply
because they are supposed to protect you from “world-views”.
Science is pure logic* and shouldn’t be confused with the scientific
process, i.e. including its non-scientific parts, such as choice of
topic, background/pre-understanding etc., and the interpretation of
results from the scientific part of the scientific process. Nor should
flaws in the scientific process (such as e.g. errors, deliberate or
accidental) be blamed on scientific logic.
And yes, logic could be described as “a vacuum” just like Negative Human
Rights is the eliminating of impositions. Logic that is dependent on a
worldview is per definition not logic at all, and Human Rights that are
dependent on an ideology/world-view (e.g. Sharia) aren’t (negative, i.e.
the basic freedom rights) Human Rights at all.
As Klevius use to put it: Our most holy duty is to NOT fill the freedom
Human Rights with anything! You shouldn’t have the positive Sharia
“right” to, for example, be raped by your husband; instead you should
have the negative right to choose not to have sex. Even a child
understands that this latter right doesn't deny you from having sex,
only protects you from imposed compulsion. The difference is, as you can
see, is mind blowing if you have been raised within an islamic
"world-view".
And this is the reason why the islamofascist muslim world
organization/Umma, Saudi initiated and based islamofascist OIC with its
fanatic Turkish Fuhrer/caliph Ekmeleddin Ihsanoglu 1) has abandoned
Human Rights and REPLACED THEM WITH SHARIA, and 2) criminalized
scrutiny/criticism of islam (the worst racist/sexist hate crime ever
against humanity) and calls any critical scrutiny "islamophobia" or
"defamation of religion".
* as Klevius has explained in Demand for Resources
(1992) pure logic is the pointing out of conceptualized deterministic
chains (e.g. 2+2=4) in a universe that is deterministic yet chaotic in
the sense that our existence-centrism excludes us from "a total,
god-like overview" (see Origin of Universe").
Here's what Klevius wrote about "islamic science" a couple of years ago
Everyone who understands islam (e.g. by reading Klevius, or by digging
history records with open eyes) knows there's no such thing as "islamic
science". This is because of islam's inborn parasitic nature (the open
historical "secret" of islam's original fuel: booty, sex and slavery)
and due cultural and technological impotency. So when someone talks
about "islamic civilization" you definitely know s/he lies! Sadly, most
people don't check these lies and haven't all read Klevius as yet.
One example is the Medieval Indian/Persian Al Beruni whom the notorious
islamic mass murderer and enslaver (one of the worst known to history -
also called
the plunderer of India), Mahmud of Ghazna, imprisoned and
let stay alive as long as he submitted to islamic Mohammedanism.
But BBC, Wikipedia etc. happily present this islamic hostage as a "muslim scientist" (sic)!
The bloodthirsty Mohammed is the evil and only pope of islam - and needs
to be pierced by Enlightenment so his ignorant followers may be
released and his deliberate followers may be ashamed. However, a
strategy based on naming evil good seems less appropriate for this task,
doesn't it.
It's truly sad that the descendants of islam's victims through 1400 years continue defending their bully!?
Remove rapetivism from islam and you have killed islam!
Don't have an interfaith dialogue with the Devil - you will inevitably loose!
Today rapetivism in islam can continue as a blunt violation of the most
basic of Human Rights, thanks to OIC and its disastrous transformation
of UN to become a fortress for islamofascism instead of a defender of
Human Rights. .