Who is Samira Ahmed and does/did she have a muslim Dad?

The following story about a confused woman may function as an example of how "God" constitutes a main problem not only for the access of full Human Rights for muslim girls/women, but also for a more relaxed, i.e. less biased, understanding of how the brain works.

Islamofascist terrorists and supporters may show up wherever and in whatever shape and background - but the blood and suffering they cause is the same

A fatherless little sex segregated girl in Diaspora confusion?!

"My dad found a way to get us on the Concorde on a short internal US flight when I was 11 year old".

It's a strange fact that it's difficult (with a normal brief search considering she is otherwise all over the web) to find anything about Samira Ahmed's Dad as well as about her views on Sharia and OIC including its demand to criminalize criticism against islam.

Samira Ahmed talks a lot - and fluently as wet soap in a bath tub - about islam and islamic feminism but is hard to find writing anything on the web about Sharia, islam's most important part according to Saudi based all muslim's world organization OIC. And according to this islamofascist UN organization women under no circumstances are allowed full Human Rights!

Left-winged Samira Ahmed's equally unintellectual (and fluent) right-winged twin Sayeeda Warsi

While the Catholic Church is in decline partly because various scandals have eroded the defense of the Church's cultural authority, oppressive cultures resting on islam, by contrast, are growing ever stronger in their rigidities.

As a British muslim, presenter Samira Ahmed has watched the rise of fundamentalist islam with bewilderment.

Klevius comment: Perhaps the very fact that she is "a British muslim" constitutes the main clue to the answer. The horrifying islamic fire in muslim land turns into a peaceful candle lit by her feminist fantasy in her London studio.

A "British muslim" could mean at least two things: 1) Someone living in one of the many more or less Taliban style Sharia ruled muslim communities in the UK, or 2) secular muslims (who are no real muslims in any sense) who pretend they can stretch islam to suite their personal lives.

Samira Ahmed: The ingrained hatred of women apparent in many aspects of Afghan society is undeniable.

The global power of women hating (islamic) clerics stunned me.

Much news analysis to mark the 10th anniversary has rightly pointed out that women and children have suffered disproportionately in the drone attacks increasingly used by NATO commanders.

Klevius comment: NATO commanders!? The man behind it is muslim born (apostate?!) Mr X "president" Barry Barakeh Hussain Obama Dunham Soetoro (or whatever). Why don't you say it Samira?!

Samira Ahmed says she is passionate about "telling the complete story". May I then suggest she takes a look at the origin of islam. Nothing peaceful as far as the sources can see. And the only explanation to the origin of islam that fits the sources (excluding muslim fairy tales, of course) is the formula suggested by Klevius: Slavery+"infidel" racism+sex segregated rapetivism+anti human rights Sharia/apostasy ban.

Hugh Kennedy (considered a foremost expert on the muslim atrocities in the vacuum left by previously retreating Byzantine forces): ”Before Abdul Malik, Mohammed is never mentioned on any official document whatsoever, nor any form of religious pronouncement”.

Samira Ahmed: I’ve found my British Indian/Pakistani and mixed religious background a huge asset to producing the most impartial and inclusive journalism.

Klevius comment: I've not! On the contrary your unfounded excusing of islam's atrocities only worsens and prolongs the suffering of islam's victims - including muslim women in muslim land.

According to BBC, Samira Ahmed investigates why a faith with over a billion followers is seen by many as misogynistic and intolerant.

Klevius comment: Perhaps because islam is misogynistic and intolerant.This is why islam cannot accept full Human Rights for girls/women.

 BBC: As part of her journey across four continents and fourteen centuries, she searches out women who have re-interpreted the Koran to fight back against tribal and patriarchal practices.

Klevius: Islam IS tribal and patriarchal practices lumped together. Islam is oppressive, muslim men are sexist and muslim women are voiceless thanks to Sharia which deprives them from basic Human Rights.


Muslim feminists: "Our message has been loud and clear: Muslim women don't need to be liberated".

however

Muslim women's voice of agency is effectively drowned in Saudi based OIC's deliberate abandoning of Human Rights by replacing them with Sharia. So no matter what "voice" muslim women try to use it will be useless. The missing key is in the Human Rights declaration and is spelled:

The complete lack of islamic science and progress

Why has there never been any true Arabic/islamic science and progress? Because of islamic Sharia parasitism, dude!

Islam is today trying to pathetically hide itself - much like the muslim Al-Qaeda terrorist Dzokhar Tsarnaev who was fueled by Saudi sponsored dreams of an islamist Khorasan

Remember that the absolute majority of deadly violence (terrorism) is committed by muslims and demanded by the Koran. Still, most of muslim street jihadism isn't even icluded. If you have a random sample of deranged people a certain percentage will commit violent crimes. However, if half of the sample is spiced with Koranic hatred against "infidels" then it's absolutely self-evident that this group will end up with even more violence! Klevius feels embarrassed to even mention such a matter of course but today we have ended up with a situation where pure visible naked evil has to be labeled as such - and even then people keep saying: But it's a religion - it can't be evil!

Are you equally ignorant and sex segregated as this muslim terroris's mother!


It was islam that more than 1,000 years ago gathered so many African slaves in what is now Iraq that a rebellion icluded more than half a million slaves.

It was islam that sanctioned African slavers to take as much as several tens of thousands of African slaves in a single pilgrimage to Mecca long before a single slave had entered the Americas.

Just a brief study of islam's history reveals an almost incomprehensible amount of slaves and suffering in the name of Allah, Mohammed and the Koran. As Klevius has repeatedly stated, we do need an islamic approach to history - not a cover up and whitewashing. Without understanding islam's deep rooted evilness one cannot make sense of the history of people contaminated by islam.

Jérôme Maurand, a 16th century French priest: "To see so many poor Christians, and especially so many little boys and girls [enslaved] caused a very great pity. The tears, wailings and cries of these poor Lipariotes, the father regarding his son and the mother her daughter... weeping while leaving their own city in order to be brought into slavery by those dogs who seemed like rapacious wolves amidst timid lambs. The old ones who hid in the cathedral were stripped and cut up while still alive just 'out of spite'. When we asked these Turks why they treated these poor Christians with such cruelty, they replied that such behavior 'had very great virtue'".

No other ideology comes even close. This is why OIC and other islam supporters so eagerly try to hide it!

The “common creed” rhetorics is what makes America (and other places) vulnerable to evil islam.

Obama: "Americans refuse to be terrorized". Klevius: Yes, by shutting their eyes.

If you are appalled by slavery, genocides and rapetivism - then you should be deeply ashamed of islam, because those are the main traces of islam in history! 

OIC wants to falsify and cover up islam's true slavery/genocide/rapetivism origin and history (i.e. what historically constitutes the worst ideological crime ever against humanity)

Klevius brief history of islam:

Origin of islam

The parasitic source code of islam: Slavery+"infidel" racism+sex segregated rapetivism+anti human rights Sharia/apostasy ban.

Origin of the Vikings (Klevius' evil forefathers)


Cathedral Catholicism

A product of the European defense against islam

Renaissance

The recovering from islamist jihadism and a slowly emerging understanding of the value of individual freedom as opposed to slavery.

Enlightenment

A slowly emerging understanding that religion is a dead end. Especially the excesses in Catholicism - which in turn was the result of islam's attacks on Europe.

Protestantism against Catholicism and the birth of industrialization and the modern (aka "Western") world civilization

When England eventually got rid of Catholicism 1688 the road was open for enlightened humans to use their individual creativity for industrial production.

Negative Human Rights declaration 1948

After the fall of the last muslim stronghold, the Ottoman "empire" (it fell as a result of the abolition of slavery), Europe again had to face a period of war  1914-1945 before resettling with a formula, Human Rights, that ended the theoretical possibility of evil racism and sexism. That the negative Human Rights were contaminated with positive so called Stalin rights should not in any sense disprove the former which are free from impositions.

The laughable oxymoron "islamic science", how could anyone possibly take it seriously?! Unless by ignorance out of whitewashing and brainwashing of course!

The  oxymoron "islamic science" is utter defamation of science, and is rooted in ignorance about the origin of islam!
Klevius science tutorial for Seyyid Hossein Nasr and others
Seyyid Hossein Nasr (“professor” of Islamic Studies at Georgetown University) at MIT Islamic Students Association (sponsored by the Pakistan Study Group, the MIT Muslim Students Association and “other groups”): “Science has its own world-view. No science is created in a vacuum. Science arose under particular circumstances in the West with certain philosophical presumptions about the nature of reality. As soon as you say, m, f, v, and a, that is, the simple parameters of classical physics, you have chosen to look at reality from a certain point of view. There is no mass, there is no force out there like that chair or table. These are particularly abstract concepts which grew in the seventeenth century on the basis of a particular concept of space, matter and motion which Newton developed. The historians and philosophers of science in the last twenty [or] thirty years have shown beyond the scepter of doubt that modern science has its own world view. It is not at all value free; nor is it a purely objective science of reality irrespective of the subject you study. It is based upon the imposition of certain categories upon the study of nature, with a remarkable success in the study of certain things, and also a remarkable lack of success [in others], depending on what you are looking at.”

Klevius: Listen to this utter crap! “Science has its own world-view. No science is created in a vacuum”. Two cardinal flaws in just twelve words! Does this muslim fella also believe that "the Western interpretation" 2+2=4 has a corresponding Sharia compliant islamic version?! The choice to look at reality from a certain point of view isn't science, just like what you choose to do with your power tool isn't the power tool!

OK, science doesn’t have its own world-view, that’s for sure. If it had it wouldn't be science anymore. This is the very definition of science. Just as Negative Human Rights don’t have a world-view either, simply because they are supposed to protect you from “world-views”.

Science is pure logic* and shouldn’t be confused with the scientific process, i.e. including its non-scientific parts, such as choice of topic, background/pre-understanding etc., and the interpretation of results from the scientific part of the scientific process. Nor should flaws in the scientific process (such as e.g. errors, deliberate or accidental) be blamed on scientific logic. And yes, logic could be described as “a vacuum” just like Negative Human Rights is the eliminating of impositions. Logic that is dependent on a worldview is per definition not logic at all, and Human Rights that are dependent on an ideology/world-view (e.g. Sharia) aren’t (negative, i.e. the basic freedom rights) Human Rights at all.

As Klevius use to put it: Our most holy duty is to NOT fill the freedom Human Rights with anything! You shouldn’t have the positive Sharia “right” to, for example, be raped by your husband; instead you should have the negative right to choose not to have sex. Even a child understands that this latter right doesn't deny you from having sex, only protects you from imposed compulsion. The difference is, as you can see, is mind blowing if you have been raised within an islamic "world-view".

And this is the reason why the islamofascist muslim world organization/Umma, Saudi initiated and based islamofascist OIC with its fanatic Turkish Fuhrer/caliph Ekmeleddin Ihsanoglu 1) has abandoned Human Rights and REPLACED THEM WITH SHARIA, and 2) criminalized scrutiny/criticism of islam (the worst racist/sexist hate crime ever against humanity) and calls any critical scrutiny "islamophobia" or "defamation of religion".

* as Klevius has explained in Demand for Resources (1992) pure logic is the pointing out of conceptualized deterministic chains (e.g. 2+2=4) in a universe that is deterministic yet chaotic in the sense that our existence-centrism excludes us from "a total, god-like overview" (see Origin of Universe").

Here's what Klevius wrote about "islamic science" a couple of years ago

Everyone who understands islam (e.g. by reading Klevius, or by digging history records with open eyes) knows there's no such thing as "islamic science". This is because of islam's inborn parasitic nature (the open historical "secret" of islam's original fuel: booty, sex and slavery) and due cultural and technological impotency. So when someone talks about "islamic civilization" you definitely know s/he lies! Sadly, most people don't check these lies and haven't all read Klevius as yet.

One example is the Medieval Indian/Persian Al Beruni whom the notorious islamic mass murderer and enslaver (one of the worst known to history - also called the plunderer of India), Mahmud of Ghazna, imprisoned and let stay alive as long as he submitted to islamic Mohammedanism.

But BBC, Wikipedia etc. happily present this islamic hostage as a "muslim scientist" (sic)!

The bloodthirsty Mohammed is the evil and only pope of islam - and needs to be pierced by Enlightenment so his ignorant followers may be released and his deliberate followers may be ashamed. However, a strategy based on naming evil good seems less appropriate for this task, doesn't it.

It's truly sad that the descendants of islam's victims through 1400 years continue defending their bully!?

 

Remove rapetivism from islam and you have killed islam!

Don't have an interfaith dialogue with the Devil - you will inevitably loose!

Today rapetivism in islam can continue as a blunt violation of the most basic of Human Rights, thanks to OIC and its disastrous transformation of UN to become a fortress for islamofascism instead of a defender of Human Rights. .

The devil's in the details

Klevius has repeatedly rejected the completely unfounded, not to say ridiculous idea that women's choice of men would have had any significance for the evolution of the modern humans in a hunting/gathering like society consisting of extended family groups scattered over huge areas and with close relatives as the most likely neighbors/contacts. It simply wasn't a dating society at all. However, what could have happened was rapetivism!

Today most civilized people have abandoned rapetivism for Human Rights. However, rapetivism still occurs frequently among certain people and religions.

Rapetivism and heterosexual attraction

Researching rapetivism in research

“I had no power to say ‘that’s not okay:’” Reports of harassment and abuse in the field, By Kate Clancy.

Klevius (who seems to be, sad to say, still the world's foremost expert on sex segregation): Sexism is a widespread social disease fueled by sex segregation/apartheid. And it's not cured by covering in burqas and Sharia.

Sex segregation results in girls being stripped off their humanhood and hence becoming the sole target for heterosexiual attraction and cultural sexism. Usually the only sex freed relationship outside a girl's own sex  in a sex segregated world is with close male kins (because they lack bio-heterosexual attraction).

Rapetivism , i.e. the enslavement/abuse of confined/veiled girls/women as physical and cultural reproducers of as many new muslims (i.e. islam) as possible under the threats from Sharia and apostasy ban, is, in fact, a form of HSA perversion , i.e. "cultural/physical necrophilia" that rests on cultural sex segregation. However, although islam is the ultimate sex segregation/apartheid, most of us, at least partially, still suffer under milder forms of the same cultural disease. This (+ our untreated vulnerability for fascism) is the main reason why evil medieval islam has been able to rise its ugly face of slavery/racism/sexism again.

(text extracted from Klevius old original writings)

So underpinning these rapes and sexist attitudes lies a cultural sex segregation/apartheid that is codified in the Bible and driven to ultimate excess in the Koran/Sharia.

God made Adam in his image but to entertain Adam he created a being called Eve from the least valuable part of Adam's skeleton, i.e. a ribbon which happens to be the only bone that has multiple copies and which doesn't cause much of a trouble even if broken.

Educate yourself on the crucial difference between positive and negative Human Rights!

Ayaan Hirsi Ali explainining islamofascism

An African woman defending Human Rights and defeating the Papacy

Klevius comment: Modern humans came out of Siberia but modern thinking seems to come out of Africa.

                                             

 PLAY VIDEO



Ayaan Hirsi Ali (on how to ban muslim schools - see video for more): Ok fine, let's change the constitution so there will be no Christian or Jewish schools. Pretty soon I realized that was unrealistic.

(laughter from the audience)

And you are laughing but you know, one of the reasons it was unrealistic was that most of the Christian schools only were Christians in name. They became kind of private elite schools. They wanted to keep out immigrants, muslim immigrants who do not meet the requirements for an elite school where parents need to be very involved in the education of their children.

And that would have been a good reason to ban Christian schools, but I realized that that would have been very unrealistic.

(something that could be interpreted as the beginning of a possible smile)

My argument for banning muslim schools is that their teaching is different, that they are alien, grooming them in Sharia, grooming them to reject the values of the country they have come to live in. That would be the philosophical argument.

But there is also an other argument. Is it fair to isolate muslim children in that way? 

Then there is a third argument. The worldwide jihadi movement for which the Muslim Brotherhood in Egypt provides the ideology, Saudi Arabia provides the money that are targeting those communities that are very vulnerable. That third alien argument also says no to muslim schools because Christian and Jewish schools are not affected in that way.


Klevius comment: True, however, sex segregation/apartheid (and due homophobia) has also been at the very heart of Judaism and, after a relatively short initial period, Christianity. So they all have kind of a "handle" here to hang on each other.

This is precisely why it's so important to educate girls away from this trapping "equality but not sameness" so to open up for the potential in Human Rights which clearly states that sex ought not to restrict rights.

Girls, your 'femininity' is imprinted in your bodies by nature (or perhaps more correctly, in the male brain, i.e. what Klevius calls heterosexual attraction). You don't need to fear "sameness" but rather be happy to have the Human Right not to be restricted in your rights (incl. reproductive rights). Sharia (in any form) is in this respect (and other) the very opposite to Human Rights. 

Islam's origin and history is that of looting paired with slave and sex parasitism. The "religious" parts do not even belong to islam other than as a means for totalitarian obedience, i.e. an early form of the worst kind of fascism.