Is Peter Klevius lhe least racist of anthropologists? And is he right about the birth of the truly modern humans in Siberia?

Update for those reading only this particular post: According to Peter Klevius evolution analysis (1981, 1992, 2012) small skulled HSS* went tropically West, and mixed with other small skulled relatives (compare e.g. the Manot skull cap 55,000 bp), while those who went North mixed with big skulled (cold adapted "mongoloid" - compare the Jinniushan woman) relatives who also spread (and sometimes hybridized) to the South and West. This pattern has been going on throughout Homo evolution. Peter Klevius analysis is the only one that fits all published empirical data - simply because it's based on them and not on fancy PC-biased models. In light of the at lest 51,200 bp sophisticated Sulawesi cave painting of humans hunting a wild pig, afropologist Prof Chris Stringer at the Natural History Museum in London still desperately believes that there may be examples of similar ancient representational art in Africa, where modern humans first evolved, but we have not found any yet. However, Chris Stringer is not only totally wrong but also stubbornly foolish to believe in Africa when everything not only point in the opposite direction, but also because Africa as a continent was equally impossible to keep women isolated long enough for human evolution as mainland Asia - which we have plenty of example of. Hybridization, yes, but not speciation. 

* HSS (Homo sapiens sapiens) used to mean us, while HS (Homo sapiens) incl. archaic variants no longer with us. However, out of "afropologist" PC charlatanism this distinction was deleted - compare e.g. how the extremely archaic Jebel Irhoud skull is hyped as "the earliest Homo sapiens". So while Peter Klevius is a bias free (almost) anthropologist whose out of SE Asia analysis fits the latest sudden (due to a cold snap with low sea level around 60-65,000 bp) main updating of the HSS brain, and our genetic swalloving of e.g. the Neanderthals and due development of an exaggerated chin (which wrongly is used as a marker for HSS) and a sudden improvement in late "Neanderthal" technology, the likes of e.g. Hublin etc. try to desperately blur the line between us and less capable archaic Homos. In Peter Klevius book Resursbegär (1992) he asked why Jinniushan with a 1400 cc brain didn't go to the Moon despite having 200,000 years time to do so before we came around. And today we know she was a woman, and with a corrected brain volume of 1330 cc was well over female average today and on par with male average of today.

 

A recorded public time-line of Peter Klevius original research on evolution, consciousness, existencecentrism, anthropology and sociology 1979-2012 - and some thoughts about self-citation  

Read Peter Klevius in-depth research on The Psychosocial Freud Timeline.

Read Peter Klevius Origin of the Vikings from 2005 - now again available after Google deleted it 2014 and again in February 2024. 

Read how climate change made human evolution possible in SE Asian volatile archipelago - not on a continent like Africa. 

Peter Klevius opposite reading and correction of Greenland data compared to researchers biased with climate hysteria.

 Read how two craniopagus twins born 2006 solved the "greatest mystery in science" - and proved Peter Klevius theory from 1992-94 100% correct.  

 Read Peter Klevius thesis Pathological Symbiosis in LVU on how a hoax child-psychoanalytic concept is still used by the Swedish social state to abduct children on subjective grounds.  It also reveals (see email correspondens in appendix) how legislators were lured to pass a Human Rights violating law which was then blinked by ECHR because it was seen as below the "margin of appreciation".

How US robs the world

We live in a strange time when the worst ideological crime history knows about, now is called "a peaceful religion"

Everyone who reads Klevius knows he is the least sexist person around. However, Klevius is also the least racist person  - and has been so throughout all of his writings. So what's Klevius' secret?

When Klevius long time ago had to replace his broken down VW which had replaced his broken down Saab, and saw a beautiful used Japanese car he knew nothing about, he asked his good pal who was considered an expert on cars. 'You can't buy that!' 'Why not? It looks wonderful.' 'It's a rice cooker!' 'So - does it gonna easily break down or something? Is it bad quality?' 'No - but it's a RICE COOKER!'

So Klevius bought a rice cooker that lasted more than double the miles of the Saab and the VW TOGETHER and with much less service etc. And it was faster and had everything the Europeans lacked incl. much better brakes, lights etc. The perfect car for a poor young man with a family. Soon Klevius realized that what held for Japanese cars also held for other technology products from Japan. Btw, did you know that the final transformation from a European steel union to EU was triggered by a European fear of the superiority of Japanese technology at a time when more than two third of the world's industrial robots were made in Japan.

Soon Klevius realized that Japan wasn't only high tech but perhaps even more superior in cultural achievements, all the way from the world's oldest true ceramic pottery to art and literature and music. And all of this despite its relatively small size.

This made Klevius aware of the racist Mongoloid complex. So later on Klevius wrote about the Finnish Miss Universe, Armi Kuusela, and how her win, in the eyes of most of the Finnish people, distanced them from the East and its Mongoloids.

The wonders of Manyoshu (Ten Thousand Leaves) were produced between the fall of the Roman empire and the rise of evil islam and the dark age that followed. Makes one think.

However, an other trigger for Klevius was when he realized that Africa's native population was Mongoloid and heavily suppressed by the black Bantu speakers (see chapter Khoi, San and Bantu in Klevius Demand for Resources - on the right to be poor 1992). Why did African natives carry features for cold adaptation?

Next step was to scan the origins of mongoloids. So Klevius ended up in central Asia, northern China and Siberia. There he then encountered the Altai language theory that sounded extremely interesting for someone who masters Finnish and who is familiar with Japanese.

This was the starting point for Klevius Out of Africa as pygmies and back as global mongoloids. (please, do note that the page hasn't been altered for about a decade - reason for this will be explained sometime in the future).

Homo floresiensis appeared after Klevius outcast, and in one stroke confirmed what Klevius had thought for more than a decade. And this notion isn't to boast about Klevius but to criticize those who let their prejudices steer their science. Yes Klevius got an equally capable brain as Bolt's legs, but he still thinks that it was his lack of (or reasonably low) bias that was the real power.

Finally, Klevius appearance on the web started with Peter Klevius' definition of The HOLY (negative) HUMAN RIGHTS vs. RACE & SEX SEGREGATION (i e rapetivism).

No one who has been in touch with Klevius can report anything else than a 100% lack of racism and sexism. And this is the reason Klevius can't approve of racist/sexist islam! In other words, exactly the same reason why OIC abandoned Human Rights and replaced them with islamofascist Sharia.

Mohammed suffering with open chest in Dante's Inferno

New data push early modern humans even further to the north - and further into Klevius' out of Siberia theory*!

When will Svante Pääbo and others eventually admit that they are driving in the wrong direction on a dead end road that starts in Altai/Siberia. Why can't they read the signs - or don't they dare to?!

This art/tech track MUST be counted for. If not then something is horribly wrong in anthropology.

Update for those reading only this particular post: According to Peter Klevius evolution analysis (1981, 1992, 2012) small skulled HSS* went tropically West, and mixed with other small skulled relatives (compare e.g. the Manot skull cap 55,000 bp), while those who went North mixed with big skulled (cold adapted "mongoloid" - compare the Jinniushan woman) relatives who also spread (and sometimes hybridized) to the South and West. This pattern has been going on throughout Homo evolution. Peter Klevius analysis is the only one that fits all published empirical data - simply because it's based on them and not on fanct PC-biased models.

* HSS (Homo sapiens sapiens) used to mean us, while HS (Homo sapiens) incl. archaic variants no longer with us. However, out of "afropologist" PC charlatanism this distinction was deleted - compare e.g. how the extremely archaic Jebel Irhoud skull is hyped as "the earliest Homo sapiens". So while Peter Klevius is a bias free (almost) anthropologist whose out of SE Asia analysis fits the latest sudden (due to a cold snap with low sea level around 60-65,000 bp) main updating of the HSS brain, and our genetic swalloving of e.g. the Neanderthals and due development of an exaggerated chin (which wrongly is used as a marker for HSS) and a sudden improvement in late "Neanderthal" technology, the likes of e.g. Hublin etc. try to desperately blur the line between us and less capable archaic Homos.


This more than 40,000 year old sophisticated stone bracelet from Altai/Siberia represents the hereto most advanced early artifact ever found. It was located nearby the non-human "Denisovan" and its manufacturing process is beyond anything we have seen at this early stage. Whereas everything else older than this found in other places follow a smooth cultural transition, this bracelet (and to a lesser extent the Lion man) represents an explosion out of the blue.

Sergey Isupov from the Russian Institute of Archeology and Ethnography says:
“The cave seems to be filled with artifacts. I doubt that scientists have ever found a similar amount of artifacts in one place anywhere else on Earth. Probably, the most interesting layer of sediment is the one which has received the number 11. This layer dates back to the transitional period between the middle Paleolithic Age to the upper Paleolithic Age. It is here where remains of humans of an earlier unknown species were found.”

The Denisova cave is situated near the Anuy River in Gorny Altay in Siberia in a mountaineous region known for its many caves. It's included in the UNESCO World Heritage List. Artifacts found in this cave are so scientifically significant that some compare it with the artifacts of Egyptian pyramids. That's however, like comparing a Lexus with a Mini. The Egyptians just copied Sumerians and fanatically exaggerated the ziggurats. Senseless piling of stones on top of each other has nothing to do with intelligence or sophistication. And look at the lousy Egyptian portraits and compare them with this that was made 24,000 years earlier! Give Klevius a break.

In Dolní Věstonice, Eastern Europe a 3d portrait is now scientifically dated to at least 29,000 BP. The performance of its creator is on an extremely high cultural level when considering it predates Mideastern civilizations with some23,000 years, and that it evolved in a cultural tradition that has never been found in Africa or Mideast.

This lion-headed figure from central Europe and associated with the archaeological Aurignacian culture is the oldest known zoomorphic sculpture in the world and one of the oldest known sculptures in general. The figurine has now been redated from 32,000 years to about 40,000 years old by carbon dating material from the same layer in which it was found. It is then temporary with the fantastic Denisova bracelet from Altai which is a far more sophisticated product.

According to Klevius theory (modified only to fit Homo floresiensis, Denisovan and the Red Deer Cave people) the new brain was genetically transported in small but growing skulls from SE Asia to the Altai region where it finally spread into the spacious skulls of northern Neanderthals and Homo sapiens. In other words in the opposite direction to what Pääbo and others have suggested.

Ust-Ishim man

Oldest modern human DNA found in Siberia.'The femur belonged to an H. sapiens man who had slightly more Neandertal DNA, distributed in different parts of his genome, than do living Europeans and Asians. His Neandertal DNA is also concentrated into longer chunks than in living people.'

Neandertal DNA in the Ust-Ishim man indicates that he lived soon after the interbreeding estimated at between 50,000 to 60,000 bp.

This is early enough to place the modern human before and north of the Denisova bracelet.

However, before Pääbo & Co reveal their findings nothing more can be said at this stage. But Klevius will be back when it happens.

Klevius' final solution to the problem with islam

Klevius' final solution to the problem with islam

Klevius question: How come that BBC (world leading media) and Aftonbladet (Scandinavia leading media) both completely miss the world's biggest fascist organization and its new Fuhrer against Human Rights?

When do we start checking for the oil leaks in these fascism supporting media engines?!

 Klevius suggestion: Dear reader, do contemplate the real meaning of this  world wide media deception!


Aftonbladet has with all its media power relentlessly doped its reader about Sweden's only islam critical party Sverigedemokraterna (SD) - to an extent that the party is now about to fall in pieces because a split on its view on islam. Or put in other words, Aftonbladet's extreme demonizing of islam critics, which Aftonbladet call 'islam haters', has opened up for not only general disgust but also physical violence against SD-members - in short the same tactics as used by Hitler, Pol Pot etc. 

But I've got a muslim friend - don't generalize all muslims and all islam!

 Klevius answer:

 Ask your muslim friend if s/he supports OIC and its Sharia against Human Rights!

At this point you really also need to re-check your knowledge ignorance about islam: If you're not 100% convinced as yet that islam has been by far the worst slave raider/trader ideology in world history - then you need some really serious reading you won't find in yours or your children's school books.

Then ask her/him why s/he is against Human Rights for all! That will force your friend to either abandon islam or reveal that s/he is an islamofascist!

And finally a warning to all girls/women falling in love with a muslim boy/man: Your basic Human Rights are doomed if he is a real muslim and Sharia marries you!

BBC's muslim Sharia presenter Mishal Husain now gets her disgustingly racist/sexist islamofascist Sharia law implemented in Britain - bit by bit. But why doesn't she want to talk about this first important step and its real consequences?! As a taxpayer and payer of BBC's compulsory fees every Brit should pose that question!

Under ground-breaking guidance which would be recognised by UK courts, produced by The Law Society, High Street solicitors will, in a first real Sharia step, be able to write islamic wills that deny women an equal share of inheritances and exclude unbelievers altogether. The documents will also prevent children born out of wedlock or adopted, from being counted as legitimate heirs. Anyone married in a church, or in a civil ceremony, could be excluded from succession under Sharia, which recognise only islamic marriage.

Baroness Cox, a cross-bench peer leading a Parliamentary campaign to protect girls/women from religiously sanctioned discrimination, including UK Sharia courts in Britain: It's deeply disturbing. This violates everything that we stand for. It would make the Suffragettes turn in their graves.

Klevius question: Who are 'we' in 'everything that we stand for'. Does it include BBC's islamofascist Sharia presenter Mishal Husain?!


To be honest Klevius feels a little nostalgic of the demise of the "Sharia-is-no-threat-but-only-the-fantasies-of-islamophobes" idiots from the crew of funny Sharia clowns but as the world's foremost expert on sex apartheid (and therefore also islam) Klevius has to take responsibilty for what these idiots have already caused and may cause in the future.

Is this the last of the "Sharia-is-no-threat-but-only-the-fantasies-of-islamophobes" idiots?

Michael Smerconish (a Philly "Sharia-is-no-threat-but-only-the-fantasies-of-islamophobes" idiot): How ironic that when Susan Jarema questioned Sohail Mohammed's nomination (as a US judge), she was particularly concerned about whether he would defend the rights of women when under sharia law. I doubt she'd have anticipated how he'd rule in a domestic dispute between an unmarried couple over who could be present in a delivery room.

Klevius: How idiotic that Michael Smerconish didn't notice that neither of them were muslims! Had the man been a muslim in a simple Sharia liason (do you know how simple Sharia "marriage" can be?), then the woman's right had ABSOLUTELY NOT been recognized by "judge"* Mohammed - or, alternatively, judge Muhammed would have become an apostate in no time at all!

And how idiotic that Michael Smerconish (and his dhimmidiotic-alikes)

An other tragic dhimmidiot: What point does it make to say a person is a Christian, Muslim, Jew, Atheist if they do something wrong?

Klevius: The point is whether s/he does it because of religion! Simple as that. Yes, I know I made your day. Btw, Atheists are the only ones without an excusing ideology!


United Kamikaze Islam Protectors

Nigel Farage's (UKIP leader) pledge that he was proud UKIP politicians could "say what they like" lasted all of around 30 minutes at the party's spring conference, with panicked organisers apparently attempting to remove six journalists from a party debate on Sharia law. Journalists from the Financial Times, Bloomberg and the Telegraph were among those told they could not stay in the half-full conference room in Torquay for the party debate on the use of Islamic law in Britain. Jim Pickard, the Financial Times' political correspondent, said he and his fellow journalists had refused to leave when asked to by party staff.


Tags: Iyad Madani, Kent Ekeroth, Linus Bylund, Mishal Husain, OIC, sharia,

'Sharia-is-no-threat-but-only-the-fantasies-of-islamophobes' dhimmidiots

'Sharia-is-no-threat-but-only-the-fantasies-of-islamophobes' dhimmidiots

 

BBC's muslim Sharia presenter Mishal Husain now gets her disgustingly racist/sexist islamofascist Sharia law implemented in Britain - bit by bit. But why doesn't she want to talk about this first important step and its real consequences?! As a taxpayer and payer of BBC's compulsory fees every Brit should pose that question!

Under ground-breaking guidance which would be recognised by UK courts, produced by The Law Society, High Street solicitors will, in a first real Sharia step, be able to write islamic wills that deny women an equal share of inheritances and exclude unbelievers altogether. The documents will also prevent children born out of wedlock or adopted, from being counted as legitimate heirs. Anyone married in a church, or in a civil ceremony, could be excluded from succession under Sharia, which recognise only islamic marriage.

Baroness Cox, a cross-bench peer leading a Parliamentary campaign to protect girls/women from religiously sanctioned discrimination, including UK Sharia courts in Britain: It's deeply disturbing. This violates everything that we stand for. It would make the Suffragettes turn in their graves.

Klevius question: Who are 'we' in 'everything that we stand for'. Does it include BBC's islamofascist Sharia presenter Mishal Husain?!


To be honest Klevius feels a little nostalgic of the demise of the "Sharia-is-no-threat-but-only-the-fantasies-of-islamophobes" idiots from the crew of funny Sharia clowns but as the world's foremost expert on sex apartheid (and therefore also islam) Klevius has to take responsibilty for what these idiots have already caused and may cause in the future.

Is this the last of the "Sharia-is-no-threat-but-only-the-fantasies-of-islamophobes" idiots?

Michael Smerconish (a Philly "Sharia-is-no-threat-but-only-the-fantasies-of-islamophobes" idiot): How ironic that when Susan Jarema questioned Sohail Mohammed's nomination (as a US judge), she was particularly concerned about whether he would defend the rights of women when under sharia law. I doubt she'd have anticipated how he'd rule in a domestic dispute between an unmarried couple over who could be present in a delivery room.

Klevius: How idiotic that Michael Smerconish didn't notice that neither of them were muslims! Had the man been a muslim in a simple Sharia liason (do you know how simple Sharia "marriage" can be?), then the woman's right had ABSOLUTELY NOT been recognized by "judge"* Mohammed - or, alternatively, judge Muhammed would have become an apostate in no time at all!

And how idiotic that Michael Smerconish (and his dhimmidiotic-alikes)

An other tragic dhimmidiot: What point does it make to say a person is a Christian, Muslim, Jew, Atheist if they do something wrong?

Klevius: The point is whether s/he does it because of religion! Simple as that. Yes, I know I made your day. Btw, Atheists are the only ones without an excusing ideology!


United Kamikaze Islam Protectors

Nigel Farage's (UKIP leader) pledge that he was proud UKIP politicians could "say what they like" lasted all of around 30 minutes at the party's spring conference, with panicked organisers apparently attempting to remove six journalists from a party debate on Sharia law. Journalists from the Financial Times, Bloomberg and the Telegraph were among those told they could not stay in the half-full conference room in Torquay for the party debate on the use of Islamic law in Britain. Jim Pickard, the Financial Times' political correspondent, said he and his fellow journalists had refused to leave when asked to by party staff.

And here is the Saudi based OIC's Sharia Fuhrer over all the world's muslims (incl. Mishal Husain), Iyad Madani

Ask if your pilot is a real muslim before you fly! ALWAYS!

Update: This posting was made on the basis of the information Malaysian authorities gave us. Now alternative info starts coming. Is it real or is it an attempt to cover it up? However 9/11 and thousands of other muslim terrorist attacks were real and sanctioned by islam!

There's no way for you to know whether a muslim is a mosque rat or a mosque mouse. But you do know that muslims commit most of religiously motivated crimes against humanity and Human Rights!

Muslim pilot/s (Zaharie Ahmad Shah and/or Fariq Abdul Hamid) may have caused the death of over 200 on  MH370. Why? Because of islam and "islamic studies"! Because of sloppy checks of landing gears etc?

We do know these pilots previously behaved in a way completely inappropriate for pilots responsible of human lives. 

Fariq Ab Hamid's neighbourhood mosque's imam, Ahmad Sharafi Ali Asrah, defends Fariq - the youngest son of Selangor public works department deputy director Abdul Hamid Mad Daud - as a mild-mannered "good boy" who also attended islamic courses.

Fariq Ab Hamid is also said to be "community-minded".

It has also been reported that Fariq often played futsal with neighborhood youngsters and even paid for their sports shirts.

Fariq was reportedly planning to marry a muslim pilot from another airline.

A report said that Captain Nadira Ramli, 26, who is attached with AirAsia, is a daughter of a senior Malaysia Airlines pilot.

Klevius question: But, after all, is there only one sort of real muslims?

Klevius history lesson: The "Tatar yoke" of Crimistan is directly connected to the evil origin of islam

Klevius history lesson: The "Tatar yoke" of Crimistan is directly connected to the evil origin of islam

Dear reader, the islamic enslavement of people throughout its history is of such monumental proportion that it's easy to understand that many hesitate even to think the very thought - that the only explanation to this and islam's history of violent emergence and expansion can only be understood if reading the Koran literally. But, after all, islam is a religion and isn't a religion the very guarantee for less evil? The answer is NO. Religion is the best excuse for evil. And of the Judaic traditions islam is now the worst simply because it's the last and most elaborated "Abrahamic" religious ideology purely for parasitism and rapetivism.
Islam made the enslavement of others (the "infidels" and women) its very basis and therefore continued when the rest of the world stopped. And even in medieval times the enslavement of others  would have been far less without an ideology that expressly sanctioned and asked for it.

Islam, Turkey and OIC the real factors behind violence in Ukraine?

 Let Klevius explain:

Is this the new scimitar flag of Crimistan?

The islamic scimitar stands for pure evil in history (yet sometimes the real meaning of it has been conflated).

 In line with Astrachan (and others)

To understand this you need to understand Finland's original flag which shows the islamic scimitar (symbolizing the "Tatar* or Turk yoke") in a completely opposite light (the Finnish lion trampling evil islam**).

* Meaning those Tatars who followed islam's original parasitic path of looting and enslaving.

** The scimitar on the Finnish coat of arms was without any doubt seen as a symbol for the islamic evil represented by the "Turk" who was back then understood as both Ottoman muslim Turks as well as Turkic speaking muslim Tatars out of the Golden horde. - No? Oh sorry, Klevius forgot you are so full of prejudices against anything that doesn't paint islam neat and nice. So, why not try the words Nazism and Nazis when considering those evil muslims who under islam pillaged, murdered, raped and enslaved more people during 1400 years than any other ideology whatsoever (and always remember that most German Nazis were not that evil at all - just like most muslims)! And as a bonus you may add that islam from its origin and still today sanctions slavery, racism and sexism. And if you don't trust Klevius, just take a thorough read of OIC's (all the world's muslims Umma) Sharia declaration against Human Rights in UN!

The original Finnish flag based on a 16th century coat of arms.

This (below) is Finland's contemporary coat of arms. A Finnish researcher tried in vain to "explain" (on a thousand pages) away the islamic symbolism of the scimitar.

This (below) is Karelia's old coat of arms.

Karelia bordered the medieval Novgorod republic which was ransacked by muslim Bolgars who hunted for slaves. The southern part became an important hub in the islamic slave finance as Vikings and Kazar Jews etc served the islaic caliphate in the south and later on the Ottoman Turks.

Fair skinned female sex slaves from northern Europe were the by far most valuable according to islamic price lists

(see more about this here)

Most of what you read about Vikings on the web is wrong. The Viking age started already before 750 in the east (because of islamic demand for sex slaves). So forget about Britain 786. Also remember that if you see the words Norway or Norwegians mentioned re. Vikings then throw the link/book away. There was no Norway or Norwegians or a Norwegian language during the Viking age! Educate yourself on Origin of the Vikings.

In 882, Rurik's successor, Oleg of Novgorod, conquered Kiev and founded the state of Kievan Rus.

After the Kievan Russian state began to disintegrate in 1132, slaves became much more numerous as inhabitants of neighboring East Slavic principalities (much of the territory between Poland-Lithuania and the Volga River) became fair game for enslavement.

Jewish merchants took East Slavic slaves from Novgorod to western destinations. Other East Slavic slaves were continuously "harvested" by the Turkic peoples (Tatars) inhabiting the southern and eastern frontiers of Rus' and subsequently sold to buyers mainly in the Arab countries.

The Mongol invasions into Rus' from 1236-1240 accelerated the disintegration of Kievan Rus' that had commenced in 1132.

Continuous Tatar slave raids replaced those of the pre-1240 Turkic peoples who had roamed the Ukranian steppe. In these centuries the word "slave" was borrowed from the ethnonym "Slav."

During the ensuing period of the "Tatar yoke" (1237-1480), the export of slaves through Novgorod continued and the Novgorodian slave market at the intersection of Slave and High Streets was the most active business locale in the entire Republic of Novgorod, which encompassed much of Russia north of the Volga to the White Sea.


The Crimean Tatars had converted to islam in the 1300s and in 1475 the Crimean Khanate became a protectorate of the Ottoman Empire while itself still clinging to power over the Duchy of Muscovy.  In 1480, the Muscovites threw off the "Tatar Yoke" and began the unification of Russia under Slavic rulers.  By 1503, those rulers would declare Russia the Third Roman Empire, and take the title of Tsar.

The Crimean Tatars made use of their strategic position between the Ottomans and the Russians and supplied slaves for the Ottoman Janissary corps from the neighboring peoples to an enormous extent yet to be fully mapped.

Greedy rulers either married a muslim and naively agreed* to convert or just found islam the perfect sword for evil but profitable slave finance

* Islam is an evil dead end. A totalitarian harpoon that has only one direction unless it's stopped. This is one of the many reasons why islam is completely out of sync with Human Rights - a fact that not only Klevius but also OIC has realized!

Little is known about the timeline of the islamization of Inner Asia and the Turkic peoples who lay beyond the bounds of the caliphate. Around 7th century and 8th century, there were some states of Turkic peoples like Turkic Khazar Khaganate and Turkic Turgesh Khaganete who fought against the caliphate in order to stop Arabization and islamization in Asia. From the 9th century onwards, the Turks (at least individually, if not yet through adoption by their states) began to convert to islam. The Bulgars of the Volga, to whom the modern Volga Tatars trace their islamic roots, are noted to have adopted islamic evil early on. When the Friar William of Rubruck visited the encampment of Batu Khan of the Golden Horde, who had recently completed the Mongol invasion of Volga Bulgaria, he noted "I wonder what devil carried the law of Machomet there".

Different political functions of the islamic myth to legitimate power

Quite contrary to the populist academic discourse that within an islamic worldview, the production of "eventually" correct ritual behavior can be a gateway for "the grace of Allah" to produce "correct belief", the crude reality of islam's own tenets points clearly - and without the slightest anomaly from non-islamic history in sight - to a profitable parasitic formula crudely chiseled on pre-existing Judaic dogmas. This formula, which in one sweep eliminates otherwise "puzzling" historical events, goes like this (taken from www.klevius.info):

The root formula of Islam (Klevius 2001)

Slavery+"infidel" racism+sex segregated rapetivism+anti human rights Sharia/apostasy ban.

Why isn't the worst crime ever against humanity criminalized, but instead protected by the very Human Rights islam opposes?!





Converts to islam don't have to understand anything to be a "good muslim" simply because accepting totalitarian islam is the only proof needed. However, other muslims might not approve of it...

Some researchers think that until the islamization of Central Asia the main motif of conversion narratives was that of the "holy war"/jihad.

If jihad as a metaphor for the internal struggle of the individual to submit to Allah, should have been a main pillar of original islam then islam would never had emerged in the first place.

Tukles conversion narrative is evidence of a common syncretic production between evil (but parasitically profitable) islamic tenets and indigenous Central Asian motifs. Hence conversion stories are the result of what the convert brings with him mixed with some chosen forms of utilizing islamic evil tenets. This is the simple truth behind the blabbing about "many faces of islam".

There is only one face of true islam - and it's ugly!



Submitted by Ianus (Poland), Mar 1, 2012 at 15:09

Mozere writes :

> after all this talk of turkish atrocities etc you can still see on a map ,after 500 years of Ottoman rule,the countries ,languages,cultures of Serbia,Bulgaria,Romania,Armenia,Albenia etc ,<

With the exception of Albania - which had a privileged position in the Ottoman Empire and which was forced by the great Powers to become independent of her master in 1913 for otherwise it would have been partitioned between Serbia and Greece, and in which after "independence" uprisings were started with the jihadist Turkish flags hoisted up and slogans "Back to Turkey" circulated - all the other nations mentioned had to go through ordeals of massacres, genocides, horrors and wars before they got rid of the Turkish nightmare. They regained freedom, retained language and culture not because but despite their Turkish oppressors. The Skull Tower of Nis, the Bulgarian horrors, the Armenian genocide and the Greek genocide are the bloody landmarks in the long struggle against the Moslem oppressors from Asia.

> but where are the countries of Crimean Tartars<

S. Herberstein, an ambassador from Emperor Charles V to Muscovy wrote about Mehmet Ghirey's slave-hunting expedition of 1521 "He took with him from Muscovy so great a multitude of captives as would scarcely be considered credible; they say the number exceeded eight hundred thousand, part of whom he sold in Kaffa to theTurks, and part he slew. The old and infirmed men, who will not fetch much at a sale, are given up to the Tatar youths, either to be stoned, or to be thrown into the sea, or to be killed by any sort of death they might please."

Mikhalon the Lithuanian wrote around 1550 in his book "De moribus Tatarorum Lituanorum et Moscorum" : "The Crimean Tatars have much more slaves than livestock. Therefore they supply them also to other lands. Many ships loaded with arms, clothes and horses came to them one after another from beyond the Pontus and from Asia, and left always from them with slaves. ……. So these plunderers always are in possession not only of slaves for trade with other people but also have slaves for their own estates and to satisfy at home their cruelty and waywardness. In fact we often find among these unfortunate people very strong men, who, if not castrated, are branded on the forehead or on the cheek, and are tormented by day at work and by night in dungeons."

The Crimean Khanate existed as a slave-hunting outpost of the Ottoman empire. Its whole economy was based on slave raids and slave trade. As one scholar points out in his work "The Crimean Tatars and their Russsian captive slaves" "From the beginning of the 16th century until the end of 17th century the Crimean Tatar raider bands made almost annual forays into agricultural Slavic lands searching for captives to sell as slaves... the slave trade was the most important basis for the Crimean Tatar economy in the 16th and 17th centuries. During these centuries, the Crimean Khanate remained the main supplier of Slavic slaves, almost all of which were captured in southern Poland or Muscovite Russia, and brought back to the Crimea by their raiders. Most of their raids seemed neither to have had any military purpose, nor politico-territorial ambitions. The taking of captives and the selling them as slaves for the Crimean Tatars was purely an "economic" activity. R. Hellie refers to the Crimean Tatar's raiding activities as their "industry":

Slave raiding into Muscovy reached crisis proportions after 1475, when the Ottomans took over the Black Sea slave trade from the Genoese and the Crimean began slave raiding as a major industry, especially between 1514 and 1654....The sale of slaves brought great profit to the Crimean raiders, because they were in great demand from the Ottoman Empire."

As long as the victims didn't learn how to defend their lives, their property and their families the slave hunters' system worked perfectly "well".

"The Crimean raiders have to hand over ten percent of their human booty to the government as a kind of custom tax at the frontier of the Crimean Khanate. Most captives were usually driven to Kaffa, the largest slave market of the Crimea under the direct administration of the Ottoman Empire, and were sold there to the slave merchants....Nearly seventy percent of the slaves sold in Kaffa were driven onto ships and dispatched to Istanbul... When they arrived, the Ottoman officials first examined the new "cargos" and chose the best slaves: the most beautiful women for the sultan's harem, the most handsome and the strongest men for his palace service. The remaining ones were purchased either by the government for navy, or by the slave merchants of Istanbul..."

It is estimated that c. 1 000 000 Poles were captured by the Tatar slave-hunters to be sold into Moslem slavery and a corresponding number of Russians. The problem of slave hunting was so acute and desperate for the Russian state that there existed a special "Ministry of Ransom" and a special permanent tax was collected to redeem Slavic slaves from the Tatar/Turkish captivity whose horrors are hard to imagine today for a civilized person that is rarely confronted with contemporary historical sources and grim realities.

But now with all the brutal reality of what the Crimean Khanate stood for, Mozere dares ask with a complaint and innocence of a wounded Moslem angel : "Why is there no Moslem slave-hunting state in the Crimea? Where are the slave hunters of Bakcisarai? Why are the once overcrowded slave markets of Kaffa empty? Why are no Polish,Russian and Lithuanian slaves drudging in the fields and tending herds of their Tatar masters? Why don't young Tatars learn cruelty by tormenting their defenseless Russian slaves, stoning the ill ones, cutting the noses and castrating the recalcitrant ones ? What a historical "injustice"! " Well, we should cherish no illusions as to the deep value system of the Turk, be his name Erdogan, Mozere or Ataturk !

> the Circassians<

What applies to the Tatars, applies also the Circassians. They lived also off banditry and kidnappings. The Bulgarian horrors started as the Circassian brigands that had fled to Turkey from Russia (the Russians tolerated no slave markets and kidnappings) were resettled to Bulgaria and started their normal "lifestyle" of slave hunters and parasitic sadists there. It provoked a rebellion that was drowned in Bulgarian blood but this brutality provoked Russia and even temporarily silenced the most faithful and devoted admirers of Turkey and Turkishness in Great Britain who could no longer deny the Turkish barbarity that was displaying its best "skills" under the eyes of the entire world !

> Pomaks of West Thracia,all exterminated, who cares they are only muslims. <

"All exterminated" ? ;) I wish you were right !

"In 1922 the Muslim minority in Thrace numbered 86,000 people. According to the latest general census (1991) it numbers approximately 98,000 to a total of 338,000 inhabitants of Thrace, i.e. 29% of the population. The minority is composed of three ethnic groups : 50% of the minority are of Turkish origin, 35% are Pomaks (an indigenous population that speaks a Slavic dialect and espoused Islam during Ottoman rule) and 15% are Roma. Each of these groups has its own spoken language and traditions. It was for this reason that the drafters of the Lausanne Treaty defined it as a religious minority...

It must also be mentioned that in Thrace and in the remote mountainous area in Xanthi where the Pomaks live, in particular, the State has set up and is financing the operation of Greek speaking secondary education schools (Gymnasiums) in which the teaching of the lesson of religion in the Turkish language and the teaching of the Koran in Arabic have been introduced."