Pages

Wednesday, April 14, 2010

Why has Mideast ALWAYS lagged behind? A 32,000 yr perspective & Klevius answer to Ibn Khaldun & others

 Paintings of horses & lions produced in Central Europe between 18,000-32,000 yrs ago, i.e. more than 12,000 yrs before the first Mideastern civilization (non-semitic Sumer)! Just chew on it & start reconsidering senseless Mideastern "monotheism(s)! Senseless if you understand anything abt the basis for (negative) Human Rights (i.e. the very opposite to islam/Koran/Sharia etc - islam btw is a very late & distorted, & more evil, copy of Judaism, which was already a distorted copy with some troublesome features, such as the pathologically racist idea abt "monotheism" introduced by the Mitannis (a non-semitic people related to the Sumerians & coming from north of Mesopotamia at the time of Akhenaten. Btw, how long are you prepared to take this Arab/islam propaganda, such as, for example, the deliberate lie abt Arabs having anything (except as slave raiders/traders) to do with the Buddhist/Indian invention of modern numerals some 1000 yrs before islam was even thought abt, etc etc?). According to Ibn Khaldun, islam's main historian, it's a "strange fact that almostr every islamic scientist has been a non-Arab despite the fact that islam is an Arabic religion & that its founder was an Arab". He also notes: "Places conquested by Arabs will rapidly be brought to ruin".




























The oldest Egyptian face (above) is more than three times younger than more advanced European portrayals! And of corse you know that the Egyptian "civilization" was a slightly delayed copy of the original non-semitic Sumerian civilization coming from the north (just like the wheel etc inventions).

The apelike Neanderthal man had a bigger brain than we, yet didn't accomplish anything even close to Cro-Magnon man almost 30,000 yrs ago! Check out Klevius "bastard belt"!

A Mid-European sculpture that is more than three times older than the first "civilizations" in Mideast! Clearly something has contributed to the stalling of intelligence in Mideast while simultaneously the development of "Demand for Resources" has been thoroughly established. The pyramids really make me puke! Instead of drooling over them you might consider seeing them as the ruin of human creativity they are!










The world's first chariots were made in Europe & arrived much later in Mideast

Klevius answer: According to Klevius' Demand for Resources (1992), although it was climatic/environmental changes that caused the development of agriculture in Mideast (starting with the non-semitic Sumerian Mesopotamia), over population was the consequence of the need for workers & soldiers to protect the early city states with their crop etc storages, from looters. These attacking looters were usually semits, who later on took over what the Sumerians had created. From this development then the Babylonians paved the way for mindless "monotheism(s)". However, this development had little to do with intelligence but a lot to do with looting parasitism (to understand the development of human intelligence see Siberia was the crade of humans as we understand being a human)!I assume it's not that Semitic Mideasterners are born with particularly inferior brains compared to the rest of us, but rather that they happened to live in a disturbing conjunction which has created an unprecedented track record of war, terror & disaster based on parasitism. Remove modern (Westernized) Israel & oil money from Mideast & see what you get! Got it?!

Ibn Khaldun, islam's foremost historian (who was a non-Arab* from North Africa): "Arabs constitute the opposite to civilizations". "Plunder & pillage is in the Arab's very nature!" "Also the Arabs don't bother abt laws. This is why they needed a phrophet."
* Ibn Khaldun's Arab ancestry is not only disputed but also constitutes a double oxymoron in that 1) a 600 yr "ancestry" jump is quite meaningless per se, and 2) that his maternal line most likely involved mostly non-Arab sex slaves! Moreover, what's an Arab anyway?! Check history & you'll find the term is more elusive than re. most other people!

Klevius comment to Ibn Khaldun: This is why islam, the worst crime ever against humanity, emerged among Arabs as institutionalized pillage (historically in the form of slavery, but now sponging on Western oil money)!

As Klevius has emphasized all his life: It's no coincidence that Mideast was the cradle of "monotheism(s)"!

Islam is, & has always been, all abt racist/sexist parasitic reproduction. Islam is the biggest & thinnest bubble in history. And the babble abt this bubble which contains nothing but evil, is usually equally empty!

If you want to jump as far away from silly "monotheism(s) you may combine the following readings:

Klevius' Negative Human Rights analysis
Klevius description of how the brain really works

After that you might come out as a non'sexist & non'racist, liberated from the heavy shackles of racist/sexist "monotheism's"! And as Klevius has pointed out repeatedly, it wasn't because they were "Europeans"/"Africans" etc but because they happened to be in Europe/Africa etc! Segregation is the most stupid of social behavior, yet it's still very popular among racist/sexist morons!

It's really time now for the silent non-monotheist majority "faith" to be heard & respected, at least equally but possibly even more than racist/sexist "monotheism" "faiths", isn't it!

And finally, isn't it abt time for you to realize that OIC (islam's world organization) in UN & Mr X "president" in US, together constitute the worst threat to your freedom! Don't know what's OIC?! Ok, so then you obviously don't know that Human Rights are abt to be replaced with Sharia while criticism of this is abt to be criminalized?! Educate your ignorance here!


Klevius/KLEVUX, your most credible & intelligent advanced source for anthropological/sociological knowledge/information/understanding free from distorting reviews by peers with limited intelligence & abundance of political/economical/religious bias! As you know, unlike mathematical sciences, social "sciences" are extremely vulnerable to (or even deliberate tools for) subjectivism! And pls, don't let the rumours that Klevius possesses academic titles function as a smear campaign against him! Klevius wrote all his main thesis BEFORE this!
Demand for resources (1981)
Demand for Resources - on the right to be poor (1992)
Angels of Antichrist (1996)
Was Jesus religious? (title changed by the publisher to 'Jesus in an anthropological perspective'), (1997)

No comments:

Post a Comment