Are we big headed chimps who killed the Homos?

Klevius important acknowledgement to the reader
This is Saudi "king" Abdullah, Mr X "president's" first call & the main islamic terrorist in the world (right now busy killing Shia muslims in Yemen)! Learn more (Origin of islam) abt him & his disgusting racist/sexist hate mongering islamic pals in the most intolerant of countries! This criminal's best friend (except for the muslim born White House guy) is Bashir, Sudan's "president" who is arrested in his absence for crimes against humanity. Abdullah is also responsible for initiating an islamic campaign (via O.I.C.'s 57 islamic member states) in UN for the purpose of criminalizing (sic) criticism against the worst crime ever against humanity! Abdullah also initiated Cairo declaration on "human rights", which is essentially a cover up for sexist Sharia (see Enlightenment vs islamic darkness)!

So what has islam to do with anthropology? Klevius answer: Quite a lot, because it was islam (via its representative Teuku Jacob) that stole & damaged the remains of the world's most important find, "Homo" floresiensis!


Using "god" & "language" for boosting oneself over the rest

As communication IS language (see Klevius groundbreaking hypothesis on consciousness) we hardly need to bother abt “whether social creatures have a language”. All communication is language or languager is just a non sense conceptualization, only useful in an everyday "language game" but hardly as a comparative tool over the human borders (anthropocentrism). We don’t consider us primitive compared to Saamis or Inuits just because we have only one word for ‘snow’, do we! The modern exaggeration of the position of "language" (i.e. words) has blinded us to believe that the distance between us & the rest of nature is bigger than it in fact is. As Klevius describes it in Demand for Resources, "to be impressed by human progress you need to be a human" (Klevius 1992:37). We take every opportunity to boost ourselves (through science, religion, politics etc) although the only thing we really need to bother abt is the least considered, nameky our most important social space, Negative Human Rights.


The extinction of Homo

There's apparently some confusing abt the Hobbit (Homo floresiensis) out there. Yesterday we could read three different news lines:

The Hobbit is a new human
The Hobbit isn't a new human
Humans may have been Hobbits

The last one might have come closest although the textual content didn't. According to Peter Klevius theory Out of Africa as pygmies & back as global mongoloids, so yes, we are, sort of! We are the product of an Australopithecine like Homo creature who hybridized with a Pan like creature, with a much more wrinkled/effective brain, in such a way that the descendant(s) were unable to return to a chimp like species but able to breed with Homo. The look alike of pre HSS Homos has made us believe we also share their brain.

A main objection against Homo floresiensis has been that it's hard to believe a creature with such a small brain could make such sophisticated tools. Klevius theory (2004 on the net) seems to be the only one (so far) that explaines it. Yes, there are a lot of brain details/differences that has yet to be arranged, but the overall development inevitably ought to have been in line with this theory, at least profiled against that very macro structure of findings/knowledge we have for now. Although Klevius probably misses oceans of details, he also pinpoints those missed by others & essential for the overall picture?

As has been repeated for many years by Klevius*, "Homo" never became human in any sense before it got a new brain from Pan. What has been seen as a fairly straight Homo evolution, starting from Australopithecus & ending in HSS, is nothing like that but a striking failure of the big brain to get anything done, according to fossil records & tool indiustries etc. Before this succesful hybridization (which might have occured several times) the Homo lineage was forced to enlarge its brain to get anything done outside their initial habitations. So when the dwarf sized hybrid 'Hobbit' first met with smaller Homos, they also transferred the genetic blueprint for a much more efficient chimp brain. Slowly but inevitably the "new" brain (developed in the opposite direction of Homo brain, due to climate etc changes & withdrawel into a dwarfing jungle environment) was poured into bigger Homo skulls, from small sized pygmy Homos to big sized sapiens Homo.


Pan/floresiensis brain vs the others

Consider these facts:

LB1's (a female Homo floresiensis)cranial capacity of 417 cm3. Average cranial capacity of female chimp is reported as 366 cm3, & of female gorilla as some 500 cm3.
Chimp (female): 325 g brain weight
Gorilla (female): 466 g brain weight
Human (female): 1228 g brain weight)

Homo habilis, the first rude tool making/using Homo, is est. to average 612 cm3 (i.e. probably less for females). We ought to jump forward more than a Million year to meet Homo erectus at a tool-making stage similar to that of Homo floresiensis, & with a brain volume that far exceeded that of the 'Hobbit'!

The assumtion that only Homo had the ability for tool making/usage has long since been disproved. This is just another piece the new puzzle that reveals that there are two more or less distinct brain capacity/behavior relations: One of them is some 50-100% more effective than the other.

Neanderthal, the Homo with the biggest ever average brain size: 24.1cm (length) x 14.6 cm (width) x 17.8 cm (height). Compare Klevius: 20cm (length) x 16.7 cm (width) x 16.5 cm (height).

Also consider that Daniel Lyons, who was allegedly a non retarded normal human, had a brain weight of 680 g corresponding to 650 cm3.

In addition you may consider that the skull, face, and wrist of the female Homo floresiensis have many unusually primitive features that resemble chimp and Australopithecus.

And the more advanced of you may consider that Ardi get's a suitable position in Klevius picture as well. Ardi is a ?-mark witch gets its full explanation with Klevius pygmy chimp/Homo hybridization, which also explains the lack of Homo diversity after this hybridization.


Klevius help for those of you (if there are any, which I doubt) who still can't hear the bell.

Just like Neanderthals, & other extinct Homos, had a large brain yet couldn't make it, gorillas & other apes have the same problem compared to chimps. A gorilla's huge advantage in brain size compared to a chimp doesn't alter the fact that a small chimp brain totally outperforms whatever gorilla when it comes to brain power.

Klevius again rests his case.

And you brave ones out there, don't hesitate to correct details in the puzzle. Klevius details are often flawed, although his macro understanding seldom is.

And btw, although Klevius in general doesn't support the use of references, in this case it could be extremely helpful to spread the message of Klevius theory. If we're lucky it might hit someone with a chimp brain, who can even read without PC glasses & prejudice!

* rumor has it there are still some morons out there who don't get the use of 'Klevius' instead of 'I'! Well, first of all, Klevius blogs/sites/books/papers etc aren't for opinions but for logic (it's an embarrasing but undeniable fact that most non-mathematical science is in the hands of simple minded people with strong subjective motivations))! Secondly, 'I' might easily be confused whereas 'Klevius' doesn't. Thirdly, although Klevius has written the (so far) most serious criticism abt the use of references (today you don’t need references because necessary information can easily be tracked anyway - in fact, the use of references often deliberately contradicts its alleged aims - see chapt. Science & references in Demand for Resources) there are still two reasons why he wants to refer to himself. The first one can be dismissed as vanity, but the other has to be understood as a contextual label signing that very macro effort (KLEVUX) which was the cradle for these kinds of insights in the first place. Of course Klevius extra ordinary brain capacity (see below - & if you don't understand Klevius "bragging", just try to look at it as an effort to intellectually capitalize important info for the world via a media that would otherwise make it be waived as just one more private "thinker") has contributed, but the main KLEVUX tool is a thought process unaltered by modern academics (yes, even Klevius has made some mistakes hence smudging his name with some academic titles - didn't I mention he's a human after all). It's a matter of fact that academic science is almost 100% polluted by mediocrity & mass ignorance & PC. However, when these traces of Klevius start looking like ordinary "science" crap out there I suggest you seriously consider dropping Klevius from your info sources!

How sexism makes "researchers" stupid

As you might already know (after having studied on KLEVUX) non-bio & needless sex segregation (i.e. ss that's more based on cultural prejudices etc than bio) is an inflamed appendix we need to cut off asap, before it bursts into a totalitarian Sharia islamic peritonitis. Moreover, whatever bio traces we might have they aren't relevant anymore because of, yes, that very same culture/civilization (Negative Human Rights) that made the free individual possible.

This sex segregation has blinded social "scientists" to an extent that is at least at the same level as the painful struggle of positioning the (flat) Earth in the Universe. See e.g. Klevius Psychosocial Freud timeline!

One of a multitude of stupid, evil or just laughable myths this medieval sexism has created & still upholds, is the sex filter applied by many evolutionists etc. Its most common forms include the male who fights other males for the purpose of planting his sperms in the princess, an other being the princess who "chooses" the best sperms by looking at his fighting skills or the size of him or some physical parts of him (like horns, feathers etc) or the abundance of colors & other expressions.

The sad fact is that we happily talk & feel a lot more than we know abt sex. Includes Klevius as well, although he at least tries to minimize his stupidity by questioning unfounded "scientific" claims no matter how "well referred" (see Chapt. Science & references in Demand for Resources) or how flattering they would be for a sexist agenda. So, for example, has it been revealed what Klevius has for long proposed, namely that male color pattern, contrary to sexist beliefs, functions as to discriminate between species for the purpose of avoiding hybridization (a sort of species incest).
Although fertile hybrids are a key element in evolution, to let them completely loose would stop that very same evolution. This is what has happened to us.

Definition of Evolution: Human evolution is trapped in an overpopulated speciation dead end

Contrary to popular belief real evolution (speciation) has stopped among humans, unless, of course some fanatic sect manages to keep themselves out of reach from the main gene flow stream for so many generations that speciation is possible (reproductive isolation), or via enetic engineering, so to protect from devolution (see also Klevius Demand for Resources - on the right to be poor & Gametes have no sex).

What is commonly misinterpreted as evolution is the expression of latent genes. However, this has nothing to do with evolution before there's a new fertile species. Even if the species itself changes it's still not evolution in any meaningful sense.
A Chihuahua isn't an evolved wolf, is it!

A species ought not to be blurred as "a separately evolving lineage that forms a single gene pool" but, according to Klevius, a hybridization that isn't fertile to one of its parents. Bio evolution, i.e. inheritable & upheld change, is a seamless part of Klevius classic formulation in Demand for Resources (1992) first published (with the same wording) in a newspaper article in 1981:

The solid state of existence is movement. Movement consists of occurences. The causality of occurences is a complex of evolution and devolution. Evolution, hence, is the deterministic outcome of variables of causality over time that enforces the complexity in previous structures (P. Klevius 1981, 1992). Also note that the lousy translation is Klevius own.

In memorial of "entropologist" Claude Levi-Strauss

Social entropy (see Klevius book Demand for Resources - on the right to be poor)

According to late "entropologist" Claude Levi-Strauss, primitive societies are "cold" while civilized societies are "warm". This important opening is developed to its extreme in Klevius (1991) where this dynamics is connected to creativity & alienation caused by investment (i.e. "expanded demands for resources"). Btw, Marx' negligence of the "primitive" quality (his biggest mistake) was rooted in his believe that investment (as he understood it) also was a "general" social principle. Unfortunately he never got a real clue abt "Bushmen" & similar gatherer/hunter societies. Also he never read Claude Levi-Strauss.

Peter Klevius theory "Out of Africa as pygmies & back as global mongoloids" in a nut shell

From the bottom to the top: Australopithecus (bigger brain but similar behavior as chimps), Normal chimp, Bonobo pygmy chimp, Homo floresiensis (smaller braincase than e.g. Lucy, who was an Australopithecine but similar tools as Homo erectus which had a brain case some three times as big as that of Homo floresiensis!).

According to Peter Klevius theory "Out of Africa as pygmies & back as global mongoloids" what we used to call Homo is an evolutionary line that became human only after late hybridization with Pan. Fossil records clearly reveal that the Homo policy of enlargening the brain case wasn't enough to enter humanlike behaviour. Only when small pygmy Homos got a more sophisticated brain from dwarfed jungle apes (Pan?) were they able to transfer this feature to their bigger (but dumb) family members. The critical point was when the pygmy chimp(?) successfully fertilized pygmy Homo without endangering the latter's possibilities to transmit the new genetic constellation (a reversed & detached chromosome). The primary result may have looked something like Homo floresiensis (a pity we don't have genetic material thanks to islam in the form of the pathetique Indonesian "professor" Teuku Jakobs, who stole & destroyed much of the material) before it transformed into modern humans (Mongoloids in the North & Negritos in the South).

Human-Chimp chromosomal comparison

For those less familiar with hybridization pls see postings below!

The final trim of the new human was made in cold but protein rich Siberia/Eurasia where adaptation created mongoloid physical features (incl so called "primitive" mongoloid features such as e.g. bigger noses etc) & Aurignacian cultural features (Aurignacian was the most advanced technology of its time & it originated outside Africa). This was the birth of humans in a modern sense! When the successful Mongoloids started to populate the world they of course met with the less developed Homos with whom they interbred & shaped, more or less, the rest of us in a variety of shapes & colors. Mongoloids and Australoids are hence the most mutually unlike because whereas Africa had a strong back migration of mongoloids Australia due to its location came to be less involved. This is also why the so called Caucasoid race (in a broad sense) came to populate what in Klevius terminology is called the "bastard belt" (the grey area on the map).


This basic idea I hypothized abt in 1991 when I wrote Demand for Resources - on the right to be poor (1992). However, it was only in May 2004 (but before I knew abt Homo floresiensis), after having for long considered the new territory that recent genetics had revealed, I went public on the web with Out of Africa as Pygmies and back as global Mongoloids. No basic changes has been made to the page since (except for some comments on Homo floresiensis). I'm not a physical anthropologist or geneticist by profession - only a lousy sociologist, although a hell of a thinker (see my outdated CV) with messy web sites! However, I'm also waiting for it to be laughable before I do anything. No one seems to laugh so far (except out of ignorance or picky "scientific" feeble mindedness). But for those who can read & think the theory is out there for use or refutation! One clever essential objection & I change parts of it or everything!

Debbie Argue & Co have done a good job in comparing Homo floresiensis with other Homos but they make the wrong conclusion because hybridization could create a similar effect & much more recently.

Origin of islam.
How consciouness works & how to build a humanlike robot

Islamic (& other) crypto-creationism blurring the true implications of Homo Floresiensis

To the left: Depictions of Homo floresiensis alive.
To the right: 1.8 million year old Homo Georgicus (Dmanisi, SE Euorope) compared to Floresiensis (Flores, Indonesia), partly contemporary (98,000 - 12,000 years ago) with modern humans like you & me (from <40,000 years ago to present). Note the different foreheads! If Homo georgicus is seen as a Eurasian advancement of the more primitive African Homo habilis it can also stand as an example for the very same pattern as first described by Klevius 2004, i.e. a repetitive "Out of Africa & back as more advanced" genetic movement fueled by climate changes. However, in the case of Homo floresiensis we may face a direct reflection of a genetic advancement (Pan-Homo hybridization) originating inside Africa & not yet affected by the Eurasian steppe.

The main obstacle for understanding Homo floresiensis may be described as: If small brained ancestors to what is still (incorrectly)assumed to be the lineage of human ancestors, couldn't make/use tools with similar brain size, then Homo floresiensis couldn't do it either.

As Homo floresiensis was discovered (by "Western" scientists) in islamofascist Indonesia it, of course, immediately became the target for not only islamo-religious "scientific" excuses, but also islamofascist anthropogical terror in the form of downright theft & damage of the remains (by the main Indonesian state "anthropologist" Teuku Jacob - see Klevius' previous writings on this embarrassing topic. Sadly this crypto-creationist "scientist" also got stupid "Westerners'" support for his perverted logic).

Indonesia, btw, also harbors Aceh (see Origin of islam, the worst crime ever against humanity), perhaps the first gate for islamic slavery evilness in SE Asia. Just like in East Africa islam spread its parasitic slave raid/trade tentacles (i.e. the original islamic finance) through a network of lower class "half-muslims" all the way to the fully infidels. Btw, who wants/dare to support/publish Klevius book A Roots Guide - a key to ethnic liberation from islam (to you morons* who say islam is part of ethnicity, please think again. When I, as a 14 year old, definitely abandoned any ties to "monogodisms" I used to say that the only difference between me & Kierkegaard was that he was monogodist religious - Klevius Definition of religion. The "Christian heritage" nonsense is nothing but empty religious propaganda)?
* "morons" because I can't believe they are that dumb, but rather that they deliberately hide their intellect in the sand! There's a huge difference between an open search for truth or an in advance closed search for amplified bias.

For you who have abandoned Freud's, Chomsky's & others stupidities & who want to get a better insight in how the human (& animal) mind really works go to EMAH (the Even More Astonishing Hypothesis).

Background

The human mtDNA "originates" in two branches (called Eve & Adam – which naming is equally misleading, stupid & influenced by “godisms” as is the “Big Bang”*) the female starting some >140,000 years ago & the male some >60,000 years ago. However, this pattern may be better described in terms of speciation through hybridization.
* Where did it "bang"?! Creation from nothing is a typical Mideast "monogodist" stupidity, the very opposite to creation from something, as is the usual logic in other creation myths (see Klevius 1992:22, Demand for Resources).

We do know that so called parallel evolution in primates has been common. We also know that fertile hybridization is possible between species genetically more distant than humans & chimp.

Lucy (an australopithecine >3 myr old, with small stature & similar brain size, who is supposed to be a human ancestor but who wasn't even close to Floresiensis tool making/usage skills - Floresiensis' stone tools include types previously only found together with Homo sapiens at Stone Age sites) has a sacrum that fits the pelvis of Floresiensis. The femur has a small head & long neck like both australopithecines and Homo habilis & the pelvis resembles australopithecines (please note that these distinctions aren't complete simply due to the lack of bones).

Floresiensis' wrist (trapezoid bone) resambles that of great apes and early hominids but unlike that of Neanderthals and modern humans.

Floresiensis some 400 cc brain is less than one-third of the average modern human & has, by some anthropologists (especially by Islamic or other "godist" "scientists" or their supporters) beem seen as "too small" to fit anything previously known about human brain evolution and too small to have been derived from Homo erectus by evolutionary dwarfing.

The ridicilous claim that Floresiensis had visited a dentist has long since been refuted & belongs to the same category of desperate excuses for a finding that disturbs fanatic "godists" & their supporters (unless they are just examples of plainly dumb "scientists" that have inflated science through our university system which doesn't filter out such "scientific" morons).

Conclusion

According to Morwood, Floresiensis' diminutive stature, long arms, and nearly chimp-size brain resemble australopithecines who lived >2 million years ago. The (Homo) Floresiensis hence may have evolved from an unknown Asian australopithecine.

Solution

Klevius comment: In line with the facts above & my Out of Africa as pygmies & back as global "mongoloids" theory, a more plausible explanation would be a late but fertile chimp-human hybridization in Africa which then spread & intermingled (e.g. via African human pygmies, Negritos etc) with big-headed but stupid Homos with less sophisticated brains, except for in some refuges where original (or close to original) "floresiensis" populations eventually got extinct. I.e. when the "new" brain was genetically poured into Homo skulls the overall IQ exploded & created the real global human.

The Hanumans?

An intriguing possibility, as indicated by Klevius three years ago, is that the M130 lineage is associated with Homo floresiensis. The possible scenario according to Klevius: Homo floresiensis came out of Africa as a result of chimp-human hybridization >100,000 years ago. At a later stage a more advanced form evolved and spread as M130. These people may have looked like a mix of human pygmies & Homo floresiensis resulting in what Ibn Battuta described as "mastiff-like people".

KLEVUX, your best (& in the case of sex segregation & islam, the only one so far) source for an informed, intelligent & truly interdisciplinary analysis on the net. Btw, did you know that humans aren't genetically improving their intelligence anymore? Contrary to what you are told students aren't more but probably less intelligent today than before (e.g. lack of niches). What has been measured isn't intelligence but cultural changes, e.g. that many more students than ever before are now prepared for an educational type of IQ test. I.e. an inflation in IQ testing. Also remember Klevius' analysis of intelligence in Demand for Resources (1992): "To understand the real nature of IQ-tests you may just consider mirroring them by making, instead of solving, IQ-tests.

So who wants to support or publish A Roots Guide - Out of Africa, Asia, & Europe as slaves, Klevius new book tracing ethnic origin through islamic/Koranic slavery? An astonishing analysis which really explores & reveals the full enormity of the connection between the birth of islam, Koran & 1400 years of an all time ongoing small & big scale slavery/rapetivism/genocide jihad. A final blow to those who try to excuse islam and/or lump islam together with other religions in this respect. You know, the old but pointless trick saying "Christians & Jews also had/took/sold slaves"! Go e.g. to Origin of Vikings & islam & press "Make a donation"!

NYT endorses Wahhabi funded racist/sexist Nation of Islam & their empty & unconstitutional representative, slave name Barack Hussein Obama!

B. Hussein Soetoro Obama's muslim* mother Ann Dunham Obama Soetoro & mentor Ingrid Mattson, America's most powerful (Saudi Wahhabi supported) islamofascist.
*A woman married to a muslim becomes one in practise (through conversion and/or submission - islam's a dead end) because of Sharia! Ingrid did it once, Ann did it twice!

Islamofascist Saudi "king" & one of his millions of victims!

HISTORICALLY ISLAM IS THE WORST CRIME EVER AGAINST HUMANITY(1400 years of continuing islamic slavery/rapetivism/genocides inscribed & sanctioned in the Koran)

The fall of USA

If you don't know yet that islam is the worst crime ever against humanity, start educate yourself here (details are old but analysis the best you can get while the Saudis are busy burying archeological evidence)!
Also learn abt the true Origin of Vikings and the grim Origin & main purpose of the mosque!
And, if you have gray matter enough to understand it, visit Human rights from Peter Klevius without love, i.e. sex segregation as the main reason (except oil money) behind global islamofascism (no stupid, it wasn't Bush, it was islam! And yes, he shouldn't have declared a crusade but a secularade!).

What exactly did NYT endorse? The worst US president ever?! One who wouldn't pass a simple security clearance because of his islamofascist associations!? Have you noticed the recent steep downwards swing among NYT contributors? Some of them are so openly & rudely racist & ill-formulated that they wouldn't pass as commentaries on most blogs.!

The movement behind US' worst racist/sexist & anti-democratic election (Saudi etc islam funded deception of US voters, a heavily biased media, unfair public presentation/spending on commercials, etc etc) is also the cause of the fall in US economy. And although Obama's mortgage fraud friends have caused the world's worst mortgage etc bankruptcy, these same pals now function as Obama's financial "advisers"! Moreover, as that wouldn't be enough, Barack Hussein Obama is a complete idiot when it comes to economy. His specialty is "race and rights", & the constitution and how to manipulate it in the best interest of islamofascism! Moreover, Obama's political etc track records are diminutive at the best and disastrous at the worst. Still, the media presents him as a "solution". However, it must also be said that his "change" slogan is absolutely true. Only the public won't know what it stands for before it's too late I'm afraid. The light-footed attitude which thinks middle-class fascism was something that could only happen in the 1930's Europe, combined with an evil medieval dragon now woken up by oil money, is today the ultimate enemy of the free world.

Barack Hussein Obama has also effectively erased every sound trace (except for some posing/mentioning to satisfy naive "white" voters) of his past in favor of islamofascism. And although his islamic-Swahili slave name Obama (from Arabic Osama - abt slave names etc see Origin of Mosque) is a trace of the world's worst slavery (the islamic slave raid/trade) a main part of his Kenyan ancestors may have been wealthy blacks who prospered by selling other blacks to the islamofascist Arabs.

Mary Anderson – Henning: Who is Obama and why are so many blindly supporting him. All his transcripts, activities and those he associated with are sealed. No one asks why. Mainstream media agreed not to print anything negative about Obama and have openly suppressed facts and protected him in every case by choosing to ignore them. Getting information out to the voting electorate has been difficult because it has been left to McCain, Palin and conservative programming. Whenever the truth is exposed, it’s called racist, a lie, diversion or smear. He’s never produced a birth certificate. Instead he has a “registration” of his birth which proves nothing. All information regarding Obama in Kenya has also been sealed. Obama has been able to hide his background through eloquence, promising the moon to the crowds and of course looking presidential. He’s not that man, however. The Annenberg Challenge both Barack and Michelle speak of were a source of millions for improvement of Chicago schools. These millions were not used for math and science and instead Obama supported William Ayers and his radical agenda which, by the way, is to create an entire generation of radicals. The question arose what makes a radical and on the list were “Hate America” and ”Kill Your Parents. Thirty attorneys descended on Alaska to dig up dirt on Sarah Palin and not one was available to look into Obama. Last December Obama was advising a radical Islamist in Kenya and raised a million dollars for Odinga to enforce Sharia Law in Kenya. Odinga didn’t win but burned 800 Christian churches.

Klevius comment: Yes, I know, on the surface Obama is very cute. Just look at the nice mix-raced guy with his mulicultural background spiced with his muslim birth in Africa & his muslim upbringing in Indonesia. Isn't that the road to peace in Mideast & the minds of plurethnic & especially islamic USA? Sorry to disturb your dream but Klevius thinks not - and Klevius is extremely seldom wrong! Perhaps sometimes in details but never in general patterns (see e.g. Klevius 1992 book Demand for Resources, the first in depth analysis of needs & wants in the interface between "civilized" and "non-civilized" societies/cultures/ethnicities)! Why? Because Klevius doesn't open his mind without a reason that, if directly understood, would be shared by most sound, thinking humans! The scary fact is the islamofascist road from Saudi Wahhabism to the US (the only big mistake that can be blamed on Bush personally is that he didn't cut his ties to the Saudi islamofascists)! However, the worst outcome of islamofascist Obama's presidency would probably be more of an already unbearable sex etc segregation (the analysis of which happens to be Klevius' specialty - although most of Klevius knowledge on this topic comes from women).

Islam, the worst crime ever against humanity, is every bit incitement to religious hatred. And the mastermind in spreading this medieval fascism is Saudi "king" Abdullah & Co! And NO, there's no "real" "good" islam other than the fundamentalist reading. "Moderate" islam is even worse than "moderate" Nazism! Wahhabism is as close you can get to true islam! And Wahhabism is as far as you can get from the US constitution & the 1948 UN Declaration on Human Rights!

To really grasp the ultimate lowness of what’s going on look at another of Obama’s close islamofascist friends, Ingrid Mattson (the poor, mislead Canadian woman (ab)used by Saudi Wahhabists to lead/dupe Americans abt islam/Sharia): “The best work of Tafseer is by Maulana Abul A'la Maududi.” Maududi: “Islam wishes to destroy all states and governments anywhere on the face of the earth which are opposed to the ideology and programme of Islam regardless of the country or the nation which rules it. The purpose of islam is to set up a state on the basis of its own ideology. It must be evident to you from this discussion that the objective of Islamic jihad is to eliminate the rule of an un-islamic system” “Islam does not recognize non-muslims right to administer state affairs”. And, according to Ingrid Mattson, “the American Constitution can be read in many different ways” (sic)! Ingrid Mattson also equates critics of violent jihad with Osama bin Laden’s violence! “These kinds of statements (i.e. sound & non-violent criticism of islam) can lead to violence (i.e. from islam)” she states without even blinking!

Klevius comment: The problem with naive women such as e.g. Ingrid Mattson, is that they didn't know the truth abt islam before they met the muslim guy & his apostasy ban/Sharia fanatic surrounding. And when they realized the gate was already closed. The inevitable islamic choice between social stoning or total submission is an easy one. What is left is the "margin of jumping jack", i.e. to "reread" the Koran in an unislamic private language. In the case of poor Ingrid Mattson, however, she has also prostituted herself by cheating her equally naive sisters. Maybe she at least can find some comfort in the Saudi money that bought her.

In a French poll 78% supported islamofascist Obama who no one knows anything abt & 1% (yes, one percent!) the experienced, non-racist, non-muslim, open & trustworthy McCain. Do I have to mention that whereas Obama hasn't delivered anything but propaganda so far, McCain has been one of the most balanced politicians US has had - no matter if you are a democrat or a republican or something else! Talking abt the power of media & the heritage from Goebbels... Klevius comment: Would 1% of the French agree with Klevius?! I take it as an insult & try to explain that percent away as right wing extremism.

BTW, who wants to sponsor/publish Roots Guide - Out of Africa, Asia & Europe as slaves, Klevius new book tracing ethnic origin through islamic slavery?

You can't "build mutual respect and understanding" with an ideology that sanctions genocides, slavery, murder, rapes & dehumanization, apostasy ban etc, can you. No way! So when Ingrid Mattson (the islamofascist Saudi-funded pseudo-wahhabist leader of American muslims who wants Sharia laws instead of the US constitution) says: "We recognized in the report the importance of media, media portrayal of Islam and Muslims..." every non-islamist should start thinking.

You "moderate muslims"! You aren't moderate. Either you are islamists or non-muslims!
Either you belong to the global fascism called islam or you defend all of us against it! Wake up or R.I.P. USA!
Is George W. Bush to become elected the last president of USA?

Out of Africa as slaves: Media's deception of the truth abt Obama

Would you vote for a candidate who:

1 doesn't fulfill the legal qualifications for being president, and who furthermore tries to cover it up instead of opening up

2 as a born muslim without committing apostasy is against the US constitution because islam rules all aspects of life & FREEDOM!

3 came to political power through a dirty network consisting of some of the worst US racists & black supremacists (Nation of islam etc) & who has never shown any hints of decency when it comes to riding on racism & sexism!

4 has never showed any hint of competence other than the competence of getting into political power positions, & who hasn't revealed anything abt his real thoughts (which can be indirectly deduced from his choice of friends etc).

Klevius comment: Is your own racism so deep so it makes you blind?!

Bill Warner (director of the Center for the Study of Political Islam):

Baraq [Barack] was the name of the winged horse-like creature that took Mohammed to Paradise in the Night Journey. Baraq can also mean God's blessing. Obama is Swahili for Osama, who was one of Mohammed's chief warriors. Osama also means lion. Hussein reminds some Americans of Saddam Hussein, and Obama's supporters get upset if it is used. Hussein was the name of Mohammed's grandson. So Obama's entire name is based upon Islamic mythology and African conquest. Barack Hussein Obama means [Allah's blessing] [Mohammed's grandson] [One of Mohammed's finest warriors].

Obama is descended from slave owners and slave traders, but he does not have a single drop of slave blood in him.

He called himself Barry, an Irish name, for many years in America. He changed what he wanted to be called after he went to Pakistan for a three-week stay. He left America as Barry and returned as Barack.

Some whites may have bought slaves from Islam for 200 years, but after that, their culture was first to outlaw slavery. So Obama changed his name from a culture that abolished slavery to a name from a culture that has enslaved others for 1400 years and has a highly detailed doctrine of slavery.