How political correctness blurs science

Michigan University feeds their students with this misleading map which is at odds with everything we now know about the traces of truly modern intelligent humans.Nothing on the map shows the cultural explosion from Altai to Western Europe that constituted the birth of humans as we now understand it. Homo floresiensis was capable of using fire and making stone tools etc with a chimp-sized+ brain. As did Homo erectus and others with much bigger brains. And despite some local varieties all Homos until M173 were incapable of making any significant breakthrough in the archeological records. Only when a more sophisticated (better packed) brain was poured into the biggest ever human skull (the northern Neanderthal) did truly intelligent humans emerge.Relative to its time the most impressive ever cultural explosion took place between Altai and the Pyrenees during 40,000-18,000 years along the M173 path until genetic "dilution" lowered intelligence to what we have today. 

Klevius comment: In fact, the map would fit quite well, not to describe human evolution but rather (except for Australia and the north eastern line) islamic slavery atrocities during 1400 years. What it shows is Koranic slave trade routes. Political correctness hence involuntary reveals its own source namely that islam is so bad so it has to be defended from open scrutiny for whatever price.

Compare that to the stunning agreement of genes (Denisova/Neanderthal) and culture (art) in the northern part of this map

We have no clue whatsoever how M168 and M130 looked like. And even if we did we still would need cultural artifacts etc. to assess their level of intelligence. Nor do we know if the new tighter CPU came from Africa or Southeast Asia (Floresiensis type? - remember that the main objection was that its brain was "too small" for achieving what it did). And M89 and M9 may be just traces of back and forth gene flow as described by Klevius. M130 may well have been a bipedal but dumb "ape-man" who hybridized with clever apes in Southeast Asia.

Or is M130, in fact, nothing more than the rest product of those who never met with northern Neanderthals on their way out of Southeast Asia?



We have no clue whatsoever how M168 and M130 looked like. Nor do we know if the new brain came from Africa or Southeast Asia, i.e. was the Floresiensis type really able to walk the M130 line? And if the ape brain came from Africa, why didn't it affect the culture of relatively big skulled (compare Hofmeyr) African Homos? And M89 and M9 may be just traces of back and forth gene flow as described by Klevius. M130 may well have been a bipedal but dumb "ape-man" who hybridized with clever apes in Southeast Asia.

Or is M130, in fact, nothing more than the rest product of those who never met with northern Neanderthals on their way out of Southeast Asia?

The above also explains the distribution of mongoloid traits. Cold adapted Denisova/Red Deer Cave type laid the basis for mongoloid features and after meeting northern Neanderthals and due creation of modern humans the back migration/hybridization left (mainly) Caucasoids (what Klevius call the grey "bastard belt" on the map below) to the West and Mongoloids to the East.

This sophisticated bracelet from Altai/Siberia represents the hereto most advanced early artifact ever found.  
It was located nearby the non-human "Denisovan".

Doggerlandians - the proto-Finnish/Uralic speaking true natives of Doggerland and Britain

From Ural to the Baltic Sea and Britain
(to really grasp the significance of this ancient water route please take a look at the islamic Origin of Vikings and Russia)

Klevius intellectual bias warning: There has been a severe "mongoloid complex" (social, not genetic) going on for long in the debate about the original Europeans, not the least among the Samis and the Finns (see what Klevius wrote about the mongoloid complex almost a decade ago). The Finns were introduced to "civilization" via Klevius ethnic people, the Finland-Swedish "colonizers", who, after Sweden's loss of Finland in the 1808-09 war, said "We aren't Swedes anymore, and we don't wanna be Russians, so let's be Finns". So they learned Finnish, many of them translated their Swedish names into Finnish ones, and one of them gathered the ancient Finnish epic Kalevala, all in an effort to strengthen the Finnish ethnicity.

Klevius brief intellectual aid to the background of the topic: Finnish and Sami researchers are possibly the least reliable (together with Afro-centrists) when it comes to the "Urheima" of the Europeans. So you will have a hard time finding info if you don't read Klevius. But keep two basic facts in mind: Proto-Uralic was here before the farmers - proto-Indo-European (PIE) was not, simply because it was tied to farming/pastoralism. And ultimately, no matter if we call it proto-Altaic or something else, what seems certain is that modern humans and their language developed in the very midst of the mongoloid hunting-gathering area (where the 40,000 BP Denisova bracelet below was found), not among farmers.

Don't you think the producers of this bracelet were able to talk?! 

After the last ice age Doggerland still connected Uralic speaking Sweden (and the Baltic Sea) with Britain a couple of thousands of years before the arrival of farming. The oldest complete skeleton of a Brit (the Cheddar man in Gough's Cave, outside Baath near Bristol) is from this time.


Background

Ago Künnap: From the Ukrainian refuge the people spread over the area that eventually extended from the so-called North Sea Land on the site of the present-day British Isles as far as the Urals. It should be regarded as probable that the Uralic lingua franca was functioning in the area also before the Last Glacial Maximum, consequently before the people gathered in the refuges. It continued functioning in the Ukrainian refuge and, in addition to this, also in the ice-free area, creating a foundation by making languages into the present-day Uralic languages. As a result of people’s spreading out from the larger refuges the whole northward Europe was shared by the Basque and Uralic type of languages.

Klevius: Today's Basques/Iberians have almost nothing to do with Europe's original hunter-gatherers. Samis do. Geneticists have long since proved that ice-age humans entered Europe from Siberia (haplogroup M173 aka R), not Mideast. Linguists have proved that they spoke a language related to Uralic. Many linguists have for long connected East and West-Eurasia in the proto-Altaic language complex at the very spot where geneticists see the splitting point that gave the birth to the truly modern humans and real Aurignacian culture. Common sense does the rest by considering the map, geography, food sources and the mix of cold-adapted northern-most Neanderthals and Denisovans.

The mongoloid features of Sami people may be explained as follows (also consider evolution map below): The first Europeans were a mix of Mongoloid and Cro-Magnon traits due to the blend of Denisova and northern Neanderthal traits with southern Homos. However, while spreading southward, what we now call the Caucasoid traits (Klevius "bastard belt") increased while the Mongoloid traits got stronger in the north due to pressure from the east.

Cheddar man was found near Bristol in England. His Finnish/Sami type of DNA closely matches contemporary Brits near the location where the skeleton was found. And the amber found beside him came from the Baltic Sea.

Cheddar man stature is estimated to 166 cm and he has a relatively high (compared to modern Sami but not to modern Finns) crural index and tibial length/trunk height indices but a total morphological pattern considered cold-adapted. This mix is in line with Klevius Out of Africa as pygmies and back as global mongoloids theory, which states that human like Homos what we used to think of as our predecessors were, in fact, big brained but dumb non-humans, and that the smart ones were small ape-like creatures (Floresiensis, Red Deer Cave people, Denisovans etc) who in Euraisa mixed with Neanderthals and later on with the southern Homos from whom we didn't get our intelligence but only part of our physical appearance (in fact, we started loosing intelligence and are now on a much lower level than some 30,000 years ago - just compare the stunning performance of Aurignacian art below). So for example, what has "puzzled" fossilized academics the most about the tiny ape-like Floresiensis with a brain size barely exceeding that of a Chimp, is how to explain its tools, use of fire etc.

Compared to many presumptuous and subjective PC academics Klevius' theory has a much better fit to existing evidence out there.


Doggerland and a harpoon found in it. Altough  the historical Goths emerge some 7,000 years later it's worth mentioning that Gotland in the Baltic Sea was already populated more than 9,500 years ago. Moreover, although no one knows the true origin of the name Gotland and Goth confusing efforts have been made to connect the origin of the name to different and less likely later forms such as e.g. 'gut' and 'jut'. Due to an enormous general ignorance there thrives a bias that could be described as a majority complex which blurs topics of evolution and linguistics etc. by covering them under the "Out of Africa" or the  "Indo-European" or the "monotheist" blanket. This type of prejudice is easily seen when you, for example, tell an English speaker that the word 'boy' comes from the Finnish/Uralic 'poika'. In fact, if we really start digging we will soon realize that most of the really old Indo-European words can be traced to the original Uralic speaking inhabitants of Europe. Btw, on Gotland 'peika' mens a girl and became maid ('piga') in Swedish. Just like the English word for child that transformed into 'girl'.

Genetic relation

Cheddar man has been genetically tested as belonging to haplogroup U5a which happens to be most common today in northern Finland and Scandinavia among Sami people and, to a lesser extent, among Finns. Haplogroup U5 is spread all over Europe but is by far best presented among Finnish speaking populations in the north. That U5 is also found in North-Africa is in line with the mixing theory below. U5a is a latecomer and hence fits a pattern of increasing blend of genes along the Atlantic coastline. U5b is also toprated among Samis as is V.


Linguistic relation

At this time all hunter-gatherers in mid/northern (and possibly sourhern)  Europe talked an Uralic language. Uralic languages preceeded Indo-European and Finno-Ugric languages and, according to linguistics, is today best survived in the Finnish* language. It is important here to realize that proto-Sami people populated all of the fringes of glacial and post-glacial Europe and that Basque language most probably was Sami related although heavily distorted by incoming linguistically non-related farmers, whereas the northern Sami became influenced by related Finnish speakers, hence explaining why today's Sami sounds so Finnish and Basque doesn't sound Finnish at all although it has many features in common with Uralic/Finnish languages.


* As Klevius has pointed out for decades, in Finnish (as in most other languages) there is no sex segregation. A person is 'hän' regardless of sex, not the stupid he/she apartheid Europe has inherited from sexist Mideastern "monotheisms".


To PC-people and others with a racist agenda blurring the facts: Non-African art from 40,000 - 25,000 years ago - i.e. long before anything like this emerged in Mideast or Africa! And one thing is for certain, they weren't neolithic farmers!

This extremely complicated to manufacture stone bracelet was made by the non-human Denisovan in Siberia 40,000 years ago by utilizing a drilling technology, comparable to modern machines, according to the researchers who found it.




.
.






In Dolní Věstonice, Central-Europe, an extremely well sculptured portrait is dated to 29,000 years ago, i.e. even earlier than the Brassempouy "Venus" portrait below, which was found in Mid-France.

Brassempouy "Venus" approx 26,000 BP
















and with some make up by Klevius

From the left: Red Deer Cave, Sami, Cro-Magnon

Klevius notes: The Hofmeyr skull represents the "roaming Homo", and despite no advanced tool etc culture, is large in relation to that of modern African males, with prominent supraorbital structures and a robust face. Morphometric analysis places Hofmeyr within the range of recent humans and close to those associated with Upper Paleolithic industries in Eurasia.

The fact that Northern Neanderthals, with whom the Denisovans interbred, differ genetically from southern Neanderthals fits Klevius theory that there was a double mixing going on: One that created the modern humans in the north and an other on the way down.



From Altai to Gotland, Sami, God, Vikings, Shakespeare and Tolkien
Klevius etymology and history remarks relating to the Britain-Scandinavia connection: The ancient Persian (which is extremely young compared to Uralic) word for god 'khoda' connects to the even more ancient Finnish 'koti' and Finno-Ugric 'kota' (=home/house/seed vessel - see Klevius definition of religion and the Vagina gate), Saami 'goahti'. German Gott (god) and Swedish gott (good) as well as Gotland (pronounced Gottland), the island in the Baltic sea that constituted a (the?) main Viking hub in their slave trade with Jews and muslims.

Gotland in particular is famous as the probable ancestral home of the Goths: "a Gothic population had crossed the Baltic Sea before the 2nd century AD, reaching Scythia at the coast of the Black Sea in modern Ukraine where Goths left their archaeological traces in the Chernyakhov culture. In the 5th and 6th centuries, they became divided as the Visigoths and the Ostrogoths, and established powerful successor-states of the Roman Empire in the Iberian peninsula and Italy. Crimean Gothic communities appear to have survived intact in Crimea until the late 18th century.

The father of Shakespeare's prototype for Hamlet was a Goth from the Gothenburg area in Sweden (were Klevius father also happened to be born). These Goths came originally from Gotland via those very same waterways that were shaped already some 9,000 years ago, hence connecting the Baltic Sea with Doggerland/North Sea.

Gotland was also the home port and treasure island for the Vikings because it naturally connected West and East via Staraja Ladoga southeast of Finland on the river way down to the south. Gotland has revealed the biggest hoards of Viking age old Arab/islamic silver coins in Northern Europe.

Immediately north of Staraja Ladoga is the homeland of the Finnish national epic Kalevala which Tolkien based his writing on.

The world's oldest fishing net is found in southeastern Finland and is some thousand years older than Cheddar man the "oldest Brit".

Bromme culture existed in what is today's Sweden already 11,700–11,000 bp.

As a curiosity it might be noted that film director Ingmar Bergman lived most of his life on Gotland where some of his most powerful movies were filmed.

In conclusion one might well argue that the Baltic Sea has been a main hub since the birth of modern humans. 

.
.

The Deer Cave people add more evidence for Klevius’ ape/homo hybridization theory

For a background to Klevius' theory see previous postings and Out of Africa as Ape/Homo hybrids and back as global Mongooids 

First and third from the left are Red Deer Cave people 14,300-11,500 years ago. Second and fourth the so called Venus from Brassempuoy in France 25-26,000 years ago. The last pic is a reconstruction of a 1.9 Million year old Homo rudolfiensis skull. They had all flat broad cheeks, no chin and rounded forehead.


Was the sculptural portrait of Venus of Brassempuoy made because she looked so different from Cro Magnon? Was she kept as a pet or something by her Cro Magnon captors?

There were certainly completely different looking modern humans living in Eurasia side by side some 26,000 years ago. And the only way to make sense of these enormous differences is Klevius hybridization theory, i.e. that the modern brain came from small ape-like creatures (compare the "scientists" who didn't believe that the small Homo floresiensis brain could be capable of tool-making, fire-making etc..

Debbie Martyr (an Orang Pendek* researcher): "the mouth is small and neat, the eyes are set wide apart and the nose is distinctly humanoid"

* Orange Pendek is the most common name given to a small but broad shouldered cryptid ceature that reportedly inhabits remote, mountainous forests on Sumatra.

Venus of Brassempuoy, one of the world's oldest real portrait
(this one slightly retouched by Klevius)

The Red Deer Cave people, discovered in southern China and who lived some 14,300-11,500 years ago  had long, broad and tall frontal lobes behind the forehead, which are associated with personality and behavior.  However, the also express prominent brow ridges, thick skull bones, flat upper faces with a broad nose, jutting jaws and lack a humanlike chin. Their brains were smaller than modern humans and they had large molar teeth, and short parietal lobes at the top of the head (associated with sensory data). According to Curnoe, "These are primitive features seen in our ancestors hundreds of thousands of years ago".

Unique features of the Red Deer Cave people include a strongly curved forehead bone, broad nose and broad eye sockets, flat and wide cheeks and wide and deep lower jaw joint to the skull base.

Klevius comment: Compare this description to Venus of Brassempouy on the pic, one of the world’s oldest portrait/sculpture of a human made some 25-26,000 years ago in what is now France.

This Cro Magnon could have been the captor of Venus of Brassempouy. Compare e.g. his protruding chin with the retracting one on Venus of Brassempouy. And keep in mind that the human chin has been an elusive and quite recent feature in human evolution. The delicate features we used to attribute to anatomically modern human while simultaneously attributing high intelligence may, in fact, not be connected at all. Slender and delicate skeletal features are not always connected with high cultural achievement. Quite the opposite when looking at skeletal remains outside the Aurignacian area..

In Dolní Věstonice, Eastern Europe a portrait of an almost modern Cro Magnon is now scientifically dated to at least 29,000 BP. The performance of its creator is on an extremely high cultural level when considering it predates Mideastern civilizations with some23,000 years, and that it evolved in a cultural tradition that has never been found in Africa or Mideast.

Klevius comment: Consider the circumstances. Small population and, at some stage, no previous "teachers". This northern part of the Aurignacian struck almost out of the blue unles you also consider the Denisova bracelet.

This extremely complicated to manufacture stone bracelet was made by the ape-like "non-human" Denisovan in Siberia 40,000 years ago by utilizing a drilling technology, comparable to modern machines, according to the researchers who found it.

Professor Ji Xueping ( Yunnan Institute of Cultural Relics and Archeology): “Because of the geographical diversity caused by the Qinghai-Tibet plateau, south-west China is well known as a biodiversity hotspot and for its great cultural diversity”.

Klevius comment: Compare what was said already 2004 (before the presentation of Homo floresiensis) on the web(and 1992 in book form): Genes were "pumped" back and forth through mostly the same (Central-Asian) geographical "veins" by frequent climate changes, hence prohibiting speciation but encouraging local "raciation".

According to Klevius' theory we got our modern brain intelligence from hybridization with apes (Pan?). These creatures were small and apelike although bipedal.  When they moved north they encountered cold adapted Homos with large skulls. This combination created the most intelligent people ever on the planet. However, when this extremely small population began expanding it dissolved with the big headed but stupid Homos hence empowering their intelligence while diluting its own. The mix became today's humans.

Homo floresiensis on Java may be, and the Denisovans in Siberia are variants on this hybrid path.

"Racial" distribution in accordance with Klevius' "Out of Siberia and back to Africa" theory (aka "Out of Africa as pygmies and back as global mongoloids"

Mongoloids and Australoids are the races most distant from each other because whereas Africa had a strong back migration of mongoloids Australia due to its location came to be less involved. This is also why the so called Caucasoid race (in a broad sense) came to populate what in Klevius terminology is called the "bastard belt" (the grey area on the map).




The senseless Mideastern "creation out of nothing" ideology got popular only because it boosted patriarchal sex apartheid (Adam created by "god" and woman created from Adam).

The incredibly stupid (see postings below) "Out of Africa" term only competes with the equally misleading and stupid "Big Bang" term - see Klevius new blog on the Origin of Universe (note that there's no 'the' in front of universe).

25,000 year old Venus of Brassempouy (Southern France) a la Klevius - and you!?

To better understand the below you may check Klevius' theory Out of "Africa" as small tiny-brained ape-men and back as modern humans (all those old Homos anthropologists dig up and "interpret" have nothing or very little to do with us)!

This (third from the left) is the most widely distributed reconstruction of Venus of Brassempouy. Stupid and heavily biased, isn't it. No resemblance at all! But what did she really look like?


And this is an emerging prototype of Klevius reconstruction. Please help to make sense of it.




Venus of Brassempouy

Yes, I know it's extremely clumsy and crude but why don't you improve it! At least have I tried to change as little as possible.

So tell me, for example, how wide should her mouth be. We do know she had no chin, just like Homo floresiensis near the Melanesians. And who knows whether a lack of chin is statistically different there? Etc, etc.







And keep in mind these maps

The map is from Well's The Journey of Man, and further developed by Klevius. It definitely proves that what we may arguably consider as humans did not develop in Africa. What came out of Africa was a small Chimp/Homo hybrid which ought not to be confused with more human-like Homos already in existence both in Eurasia and Africa (these Homos later became mixed with the down-moving modern "Aurignacian" humans from the North).

This is Denisova in Siberia where the mtDNA of a finger of a 40,000 year non-human reveals hybridization with Neanderthals and relationship with Melanesians (Floresiensis, the apeman who, with a tiny brain, was equally intelligent as Homo erectus with more than double the brain, was from the same place). Note that this finger both in time and place fits eerily well in Klevius' theory.

and the fact that Brassempouy was a relatively cold place back then

and the fact that there seems to have been a variety of phenotypes around, which fits well in a picture of relatively small population groups scattered around in different niches etc.

Interestingly, in Northern Finland and Russia there have been some reports from the 19th Century of "original" (i.e. before moved to reservation in Finland and mixed) small (males ca . 140 cm) Skolts with "fat and very ugly women". Note that, to my understanding, the researcher was not a racist based on his other writings and didn't use this kind of language about other alien people he met. It may also be noted that Skolts have had some of the fastest changes in stature after being "civilized"/mixed.



Venus of Willendorf, 24,000 years old, i.e. more or less contemporary with Venus of Brassempouy, and found in Germany (I was about to say "what is now Germany" but because fanatic Africa centrists use the word Africa about a time when the expression is meaningless, so do I - when the first Homos were around Africa wasn't around in any meaningful sense simply because the Red Sea was closed).





















.

The most intelligent people ever were Eurasians - some 30,000+ years ago

The genetic spread of modern humans started in Central-Asia Mid-Siberia.

It was a result of hybridization between clever but small brained Denisovans and stupid but big brained Neanderthals. Denisovans got their super brain from Homo floresiensis. But the "trouble" (for the conventional view) with floresiensis is that s/he had a "too small brain" for her/his actual achievemnet (this same text written in Finnish or most other non-semitic non indoeuropean languages would not have needed this stupid sex segregation s/he or her/his!). But it fits elegantly in Klevius theory.

Here in Denisova Siberia a 40,000 year old finger was found belonging to a young girl whose DNA revealed that she was a non-human but related to Neanderthals and today's Melanesians, especially those not far from Flores, the island where the apelike Homo floresiensis was found..

Mark Stoneking, professor at the Department of Evolutionary Genetics at the Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology: "The fact that Denisovan DNA can be detected in some but not other original inhabitant populations living in Southeast Asia today shows that numerous populations with and without Denisovan DNA existed over 44,000 years ago. The simplest explanation for the presence of Denisovan genetic material in some but not all groups is that Denisova people themselves lived in Southeast Asia." Klevius comment: Perfectly in line with Klevius' theory Out of Africa as ape/Homo-hybrids and back as fully developed modern humans. Homo floresiensis, found at Flores, Indonesia, has already proved that a 450 cm2 brain was enough to make/use tools and fire on a level of Homo erectus with at least double that size.



A lion headed figure, first called the lion man (German: Löwenmensch, literally "lion person"), then the lion lady (German: Löwenfrau), is an ivory sculpture that is the oldest known zoomorphic (animal-shaped) sculpture in the world and one of the oldest known sculptures in general. The sculpture has also been interpreted as anthropomorphic, giving human characteristics to an animal, although it may have represented an unfactual presence deity. The figurine was determined to be about 32,000 years old[1][2] by carbon dating material from the same layer in which the sculpture was found. It is associated with the archaeological Aurignacian culture.[3] The sculpture is 29.6 cm (11.7 inches) in height, 5.6 cm wide. and 5.9 cm thick. It was carved out of mammoth ivory using a flint stone knife. There are seven parallel, transverse, carved gouges on the left arm. It is now in the museum in Ulm, Germany.

The Venus of Brassempouy was carved from mammoth ivory. She is 3.65 cm high, 2.2 cm deep and 1.9 cm wide. Her face is triangular and seems tranquil. While forehead, nose and brows are carved in relief, the mouth is absent. A vertical crack on the right side of the face is linked to the internal structure of the ivory. On the head is a checkerboard-like pattern formed by two series of shallow incisions at right angles to each other; it has been interpreted as a wig, a hood, or simply a representation of hair. the figurine in the Middle Gravettian, with "Noailles" burins circa 26,000 to 24,000 BP. Although the style of representation is essentially realistic, the proportions of the head do not correspond exactly to any known human population of the present or past.



Denisovian became a new lineage separate from all other Homo lineages to come, about one million years ago. However, despite the long differentiation period, they were still able to interbreed with modern humans 30,000 years ago. This is apparent because their DNA is found in New Guineans and many, but not all, populations in Asia. They evidently came from Africa at about the same time as the Neanderthals and spread across Asia, while the Neanderthals claimed Europe. Neanderthal DNA is found in Australian Aborigines, and in many Europeans, but not in New Guineans, and Australian Aborigines do not have Denisovan DNA.

It has recently been shown that ancestors of New Guineans and Bougainville Islanders have inherited a proportion of their ancestry from Denisovans, an archaic hominin group from Siberia. However, only a sparse sampling of populations from Southeast Asia and Oceania were analyzed. Here, we quantify Denisova admixture in 33 additional populations from Asia and Oceania. Aboriginal Australians, Near Oceanians, Polynesians, Fijians, east Indonesians, and Mamanwa (a “Negrito” group from the Philippines) have all inherited genetic material from Denisovans, but mainland East Asians, western Indonesians, Jehai (a Negrito group from Malaysia), and Onge (a Negrito group from the Andaman Islands) have not. These results indicate that Denisova gene flow occurred into the common ancestors of New Guineans, Australians, and Mamanwa but not into the ancestors of the Jehai and Onge and suggest that relatives of present-day East Asians were not in Southeast Asia when the Denisova gene flow occurred. Our finding that descendants of the earliest inhabitants of Southeast Asia do not all harbor Denisova admixture is inconsistent with a history in which the Denisova interbreeding occurred in mainland Asia and then spread over Southeast Asia, leading to all its earliest modern human inhabitants. Instead, the data can be most parsimoniously explained if the Denisova gene flow occurred in Southeast Asia itself. Thus, archaic Denisovans must have lived over an extraordinarily broad geographic and ecological range, from Siberia to tropical Asia.

Islamic lysenkoism boosted by Western charlatans

What is islam? Here's the answer, today it's OIC's Sharia declaration!

Razib Khan, who has a background in biology & biochemistry is an Unz Foundation Junior Fellow and lives in the western United States: Frankly some of the experts (abt Homo floresiensis) strike me jokers. Here’s the problem: I don’t know who the jokers are!

Klevius answer: Simple, they are the "monotheist" ones - or their supporters! And worst of these creationists are the muslim ones because islamic creationism demands a clear cut border between human evolution and the rest of the nature. To really get the depth of this stupidity you need to read the net's by far best description of what it means to be a conscious human!

I repeat what I wrote more than five years ago: It was a muslim crypto-creationist, Teuku Jakob (head of Indonesia's anthropology), who back in 2004-5 stole and damaged the floresiensis remains while simultaneously boosting an unfounded "hypothesis" that floresiensis was a modern human suffering from microcephalia. And just as evil islam (OIC) is continuosly supported by Western idiots, Teuku Jakob was supported by, among others, the author of the recent "iodine" speculation, Charles Oxnard of the University of Western Australia!

Klevius hybrid/gene flow theory on human evolution is now by far the best explanation for "strange" hominines/humans!

If you feel frustrated abt the fact that Klevius includes (logical) islam criticism in anthropology, pls consider the frustration Klevius & others feel abt Wikipedia etc charlatanisms all the time trying to blend in islam-boosting without a trace of logic (you know, those stupid "in islam/Koran bla bla bla", truly tiresome, aren't they)! And dangerous, having in mind that OIC, which represents 1.5 Billion muslims in 57 countries, is eager to implement Sharia under the cover of "human rights" in UN!


Science is all about coming up with intelligent speculative ideas that are possible and hence could be of general interest. The sensless & unfounded view that science needs evidence instead of speculations completely misunderatands the scientific (i.e. not political) process. Every scientific process starts with speculation! Evidence to support these ideas can only be searched for AFTER such speculations. The alternative would be the death of the scientific process altogetgher! What's often confused is the scientific method with the scientific proecess. In fact, those very morons who don't have brains to distinguish between intelligent speculations & (their own) charlatanism, often hail subjectivism in different forms, e.g. by contaminating the scientific method with opinions (see more abt this on Klevius philosophy/science pages).

However, as good "speculations" need good brains, & as most researchers have average intelligence at the best, science is in need of superior intelligence (or pure luck, sometimes as a biproduct of an intense but often more or less blind search) & well informed brains for these “eggs of science” to hatch. This, however, leads to the next problem namely individual or collective “peer jealousy” (or politicism), often to an extent that contradicts science itself. This is also where you need Klevius/KLEVUX for a better understanding of your vorld. Yes, there are millions of average "opinioners" out there. However, the brain power offered by non-opinionist Klevius/KLEVUX exists only in the proportion of one in millions!



From left to right: Homo sapiens sapiens 0 yrs bp (i.e. "we") Pintubi-1 some 100 yrs bp (i.e. contemporary with "us"), Floresiensis 12,000 yrs bp (i.e. more or less contemporary with "us") Neanderthal 30,000 yrs bp (i.e. more or less contemporary with "us") Mungo man who lived some 40,000 yrs ago in Australia was a tall (6'4/190 cm) but dumb chap (compared to "ordinary"** humans) who lived some 40,000 yrs bp (i.e. almost contemporary with the birth of truly modern* "us") Sediba 2 Million yrs bp (i.e. not contemporary at all but even before Homo erectus). What seems obvious is that under conventional theories abt human evolution there's a striking lack of correspondence between skulls & intelligence until the emergence of fully modern "Aurignacians" (incl. Cro-Magnon).

* As I hinted at already 2004 in my Out of Africa as pygmies & back as global mongoloids, the term "modern humans" is highly erroneous & misleading when used to describe big-headed but simple-minded apes from the past (Homo idaltu etc). This usage is well represented by, for example, Berkeley professor Tim White, one of the worst "anthropologists" of our time (mainly because he functions like a bottlenecck against more intelligent, or less biased anthropologists - btw, he isn't an anthropologist at all, which fact doesn't seem to hinder him from uttering the most senseless stupidities re. anthropology in front of ignorant media people etc). However, Tim White may not be as stupid as he appears, it's really hard to tell because his Afro-centrism is deeper than the stone walls of Great Zimbabwe (abt the latter & its horrifying islam connection see Klevius Roots Guide & When Ibn Battuta bought his sex slave girl "in the mosque").

** It's important to note that "ordinary" humans of today on average most probably possess a lower intelligence than the "Aurignacians" (see Klevius theory). The selection for intelligence peaked in Siberia some 30,000-10,000 yrs ago, before (see Klevius theory) the spread of the new "mongoloid" modern human became global while slowly mixing with more "archaic" humans hence giving rise to the physiological pattern we still see traces of today. Also compare what Klevius call the "bastard belt", i.e. the "caucasoid" blend between modern mongoloids & more primitive "archaics". This view also explains statistical global intelligence differences.

Human diversity clearly mirrors a migrating ape! According to Klevius (2004) after hybridizing in the interface between jungle & savannah the Homo/Pan bastard spread around in the tracks of previous big but poor-brained Homos with whom it could still interbreed. This pattern has probably been going on since the time of Homo/Chimp differentiation. The savannah geared Homo was able to extensively enlarge its living space, and when it got the final brain upgrading it really took off in cold Siberia.


The qualitative difference between the brain of a bonobo pygmy chimp (left) & a gorilla (right) is bigger than between a bonobo & small brained humans!

Kow Swamp by the Murray River, Victoria, southern Australia, dating to between 11 000 BC and 7000 BC contained some 40 anatomically robus skeletal & cranial remains which lie outside the extremes of the so called Australian Aborigines (when I wrote abt Aborigines back in 1992 I focused on the period 40,000 yrs ago to the first civilizations*).

* Islam, btw, isn’t & has never been a civilization. This inferiority complex is why islam’s proponent’s desperately try to call it a “civilization” wherever they get a chance!

The Kow Swamp morphological patterns strongly indicate changes in the facial and frontal regions of Aboriginal crania from northern Victoria over the last 9000-10,000 yrs. Terminal Pleistocene skeletal remains from south-eastern Australia can be distinguished from their recent counterparts by their greater size and robusticity. This includes greater average stature, larger mean head and tooth size, thicker bones in the cranial vault, larger and more rugose areas of muscle attachment and greater mean endocranial volumes. There appears to have been a gradual reduction in body size after 9,000 years BP, with people of modern body size and shape appearing at around 6000 to 5000 years BP.


Who started evolution?

We do know what the “god-people” think, don’t we. But I’d say Darwin was "the first mover". An intelligent & informed true scientist of a type you rarely find in universities. Whereas “the first mover” is a senseless* oxymoron, Darwin is for real.

* “The first mover” is a kin to the equally insane "Big Bang". Both share the senseless monotheist fabrication of creation from "nothing" (Klevius 1992). And as soon as you have figured out that creation (from nothing) is an equally lousy concept as "god", you will also realize that there cannot possibly be a beginning, which fact in turn makes "the first mover" retroactively unemployed, doesn't it. This is also where otherwise quite senseful George Berkeley went wrong.


The extended chimp/Homo divorce

Analysis of human/chimp genetic relation reveal that hominids and chimps diverged far more recently & over a longer timescale than previously thought.

Gene flow leads to a reduced genetic variation by recombining gene pools thus repairing developing differences in genetic variation that otherwise would have led to speciation.

According to Klevius model of how the modern human came to being, it all started with repeated hybrids between Homos & apes. The now extinct ape may have been something like an advanced Bonobo & the Homo an almost equally small but slightly bigger brained non-human pygmy. The result looked something like Homo floresiensis. This creature was then able to reproduce with bigger local Homo variants. This also explains the wide & unique body size & shape variation among humans today.

Via gene flow (especially in the Central Asian climatic "veins" - see Klevius original theory presented on the net 2004) which leads to a reduction in genetic variation & due prevention of speciation, the emerging human got bigger body size & a brain case now filled with a smarter (than Homo) ape brain. This explains the poor correlation between brain size & culture such as tool technology etc.


So which is the most puzzling question for Klevius right now?

How is Homo floresiensis' super brain (i.e. the relation between brain size & culture) related to the Siberian/Aurignacian IQ explosion? Was Homo floresiensis, in fact, M130?

A possible scenario is that the Denisova finger represents a developed (cold adapted & with better feet/femurs etc) Homo floresiensis lineage already transformed through interbreeding with other Homos.

Repeated climate changes mixed jungle & savannah apes/Homos in the borderline between the dwarfing jungle & the almost treeless savannah. Although many chimps can survive on the savannah they are by no means well adapted for such an open landscape. This evolutionary pressure may have triggered the success for a world conquering hybrid who, moreover, also was/became able to interbreed with more distant Homos as well.

Our understandable fixation with physical similarities easile obstructs the possibility of alternative & rapid changes although they are right under our nose (consider, for example, a chihuahua & a grand danoise).

Modern humans hence are a product of both allopatric & ecological speciation. This kind of hybrid speciation outlined here & in Out of Africa as pygmies & back again as global mongoloids may achieve reproductive isolation between the hybrids and one of their parents while streching out along a genetic path that ended in a dead end in Australia & a cultural explosion in Siberia. Different genotypes may not only produce different phenotypes in similar environment but similar genotypes may also produce different phenotypes in a new environment. Although the cold north was already familiar for many Homos, it was only via the new high-rewing brain structure that the full potential of this abundant protein source could be utilized.

The hybrid speciation process may have been repeated many times until the new brain (coupled with previous northern Homo features) structure eventually (almost) cleaned the field & left HSS the only surviving species.


Acknowledgement

This post will be more elaborated when I get time so have patience till you see the light in the end of the tunnel...