How sexism makes "researchers" stupid

As you might already know (after having studied on KLEVUX) non-bio & needless sex segregation (i.e. ss that's more based on cultural prejudices etc than bio) is an inflamed appendix we need to cut off asap, before it bursts into a totalitarian Sharia islamic peritonitis. Moreover, whatever bio traces we might have they aren't relevant anymore because of, yes, that very same culture/civilization (Negative Human Rights) that made the free individual possible.

This sex segregation has blinded social "scientists" to an extent that is at least at the same level as the painful struggle of positioning the (flat) Earth in the Universe. See e.g. Klevius Psychosocial Freud timeline!

One of a multitude of stupid, evil or just laughable myths this medieval sexism has created & still upholds, is the sex filter applied by many evolutionists etc. Its most common forms include the male who fights other males for the purpose of planting his sperms in the princess, an other being the princess who "chooses" the best sperms by looking at his fighting skills or the size of him or some physical parts of him (like horns, feathers etc) or the abundance of colors & other expressions.

The sad fact is that we happily talk & feel a lot more than we know abt sex. Includes Klevius as well, although he at least tries to minimize his stupidity by questioning unfounded "scientific" claims no matter how "well referred" (see Chapt. Science & references in Demand for Resources) or how flattering they would be for a sexist agenda. So, for example, has it been revealed what Klevius has for long proposed, namely that male color pattern, contrary to sexist beliefs, functions as to discriminate between species for the purpose of avoiding hybridization (a sort of species incest).
Although fertile hybrids are a key element in evolution, to let them completely loose would stop that very same evolution. This is what has happened to us.

Definition of Evolution: Human evolution is trapped in an overpopulated speciation dead end

Contrary to popular belief real evolution (speciation) has stopped among humans, unless, of course some fanatic sect manages to keep themselves out of reach from the main gene flow stream for so many generations that speciation is possible (reproductive isolation), or via enetic engineering, so to protect from devolution (see also Klevius Demand for Resources - on the right to be poor & Gametes have no sex).

What is commonly misinterpreted as evolution is the expression of latent genes. However, this has nothing to do with evolution before there's a new fertile species. Even if the species itself changes it's still not evolution in any meaningful sense.
A Chihuahua isn't an evolved wolf, is it!

A species ought not to be blurred as "a separately evolving lineage that forms a single gene pool" but, according to Klevius, a hybridization that isn't fertile to one of its parents. Bio evolution, i.e. inheritable & upheld change, is a seamless part of Klevius classic formulation in Demand for Resources (1992) first published (with the same wording) in a newspaper article in 1981:

The solid state of existence is movement. Movement consists of occurences. The causality of occurences is a complex of evolution and devolution. Evolution, hence, is the deterministic outcome of variables of causality over time that enforces the complexity in previous structures (P. Klevius 1981, 1992). Also note that the lousy translation is Klevius own.