For questionable reason UK politicians may declare a country "hostile" no matter how peaceful it is and how it tries to cooperate, while UK may declare the worst of aggressive militaristic rogue states "an important ally with longtime close bonds" no matter how badly it behaves. This corruption can be traced back to Queen Elizabeth 1 and her use of pirates against countries she didn't like.
Elizabeth I made England the pirate state US/UK still are while e.g. complicit to Israel's genocide against Palestinians.
1564 Elizabeth I made England a "legal" pirate state by commissioning pirate and slave trader John Hawkins to continue his criminal deeds with her blessing and her ship Jesus of Lübeck added to the ships he already possessed.
Coat of arms granted pirate John Hawkins by Elizabeth I 1565 showing a black slave.
Early on England became a proto "sea dog empire" because it's an island that was occupied by the most talented of European seafarers, i.e. the Vikings from Russia/Fennoscandia.
Piracy is an act of violent robbery by ship or boat-borne attackers upon a coastal area. It has a long history from at least the sea people who caused the bronzeage collapse some 1200 BC, over the Goths some 2000 years ago and the Vikings 1275 years ago. And although Peter Klevius is genetically a typical Viking or Anglo-Saxon with a Swedish mother tongue - which originated in Gothic* and Old Nordic* - he only feels disgust about their cultural behavior.
*
English is a late Swedish creole language which shares most words
(except the latin ones) but spells and prounances them differently. So
for example, the originally Gothic words 'arm', 'hand', 'finger' are all
spelled similarly in modern Swedish and English but pronounced
differently.
$-embezzler (since 1971) US is the real power behind Israel's genocide against Palestinians - executed by a criminal anti-democratic dictator.
US/UK brothers in arms from firebombing civilians 1945, to Yemen 2025.
From Churchill's "operation unthinkable" plan to attack Russians after their WW2 victory, to Starmer's impossible* 2025 plan of the "coalition of the willing" to keep the proxy war against Russia keep going even after a possible peace deal.
500 years of England's (and later US) continuing state sponsored "sea dog" piracy is now doomed to end because of China's* technological superiority. However, sadly UK PM Starmer hasn't got this picture fully focused as yet.
* China's R&D superiority grants its peaceful policy - it was US military that supported the mass murderer and dictator Chiang Kai-shek to isolate Taiwan from mainland China at a time when China was weakened after the Japanese invasion. However, $-embezzler (since 1971) US is now in a desperate situation because of its reliance on feeding on the stolen world dollar which inevitably will collapse because of China's accelerating success. And US brexit puppet UK is following its criminal master rather than choosing prosperity and peace with China. Moreover, Russia has made every effort possible to create a peaceful cooperation with the West. Putin even proposed that Russia should join NATO but was of course rejected. Then Putin arranged for peaceful cooperation between EU and Russia by selling cheap and clean natural gas while importing other stuff from EU. But US said no and later even arranged to destroy the extremely expensive and important peace link called Nord Stream between Russia and Germany. And every accusation against Russia's "behavior" could easily be outperformed by even worse but neglected behavior by US.
The evil heritagefrom WW2
Western politicians blinked the appalling neo-Nazis involving civil war and genocide against Russians in Ukraine, while after the heavily provoked Russian 2022 military operation that was made to end the genocide and force Ukraine to negotiations, completely erased the important background while only ranting in terms of "Putin, the aggressor, who made an unprovoked full scale invasion of an innocent country" (many of these voices also supported US Iraq invasion). No wonder Russia turned to China which already is flying several types of 6th generation aircraft. And Nvidia's CEO Jensen Huang said China is “not behind” the U.S. in AI and praised Huawei as a top global tech company. “China, with half of the world’s AI researchers, has highly capable AI experts at every layer of the AI stack. US cannot manipulate regulators to capture victory in AI,” a spokesperson said. “They’re incredible in computing and network technology, all these essential capabilities to advance AI,” Huang said. “They have made enormous progress in the last several years.” In fact, China is already far ahead in real world comparison.
From 'operation unthinkable' to 'coalition of the willing'
The real threat and worst nightmare for UK arms hawks is that Putin again starts peaceful trading with cheap gas etc. with EU.
UK Defense Secretary John Healey on BBC (and of course no one questioning his unfounded ranting): Putin caused high gas price.
Peter Klevius: No, quite the opposite. Putin offered cheap gas via Nord Stream but Biden stopped it, and instead sells expensive LNG to EU which has heavilu affected both gas and electricity price in UK because of how it's tied to the gas price in EU.
UK Foreign Secretary David Lammy: Putin is an aggressor who must be kept responsible for his crimes.
Peter Klevius: So what about Netanyahu? Abd why not also make US/NATO leadership responsible as the aggressors who urged for NATO nuke expansion in a Ukraine that was promised to be free from nukes! After all, Onama started it in 2013, and in 2014 he toppled Ukraine's elected president and initiated a civil war and knowingly enabled a neo-Nazi genocide against Russians in Ukraine.
The questionable "will" and "willingness" of many UK politicians reveals that it's the West, not the East, that is the main threat to peace and prosperity. And why is UK so eager to arrest Iranian Shia muslims who don't pose a threat to civilians, but not Saudi sponsored Sunni islamists who do pose a constant threat to ordinary people in UK?
Russians raised the victory flag over the Reichstag in Berlin May 2, 1945, while US/UK later in the night were still bombing Kiel with napalm.
In the night of May 2 (and morning May 3) 1945 when Russian soldiers in the daytime had already raised the victory flag over the Reichstag in Berlin, UK continued to bomb a defenseless Kiel with napalm, firebombs etc.
After having firebombed defenseless civilians with some thousand bomb-planes together with US at the very end of the war, Churchill's
plan 'Operation Unthinkable' was to attack the Russian liberators.
How evil was it to plan to jump on Russians after they had made the by far biggest victory contribution and sacrificed nearly 30 Million Russians against European fascism?! UK lost 0.4 Million which should also be compared with the enormous amount of firebombed civilian deaths in attacks that had little or nothing to contribute, but was the result of Germanphobic hate spread mainly via BBC's propaganda deliberately and murdering innocent German civilians.
Churchill's plan 'Operation Unthinkable' (May 1945 after the Russians had taken Berlin and Germany had capitulated) included a surprise attack on the victorious Russian soldiers in Germany to impose "the will of the United States and British Empire upon Russia"*. The "unthinkable" plan assumed a surprise attack on Russian soldiers stationed in Germany to impose "the will of UK and US upon Russia". "The will" was qualified as "a square deal for Poland", but added that "that does not necessarily limit the military commitment". The assessment, signed by the Chief of Army Staff on 9 June 1945, concluded: "It would be beyond our power to win a quick but limited success and we would be committed to a protracted war against heavy odds". The code name was now reused instead for a second plan, which was a defensive scenario by which UK was to defend against a Russian drive towards the North Sea and the Atlantic Ocean after the withdrawal of the US forces from the Continent. When the Labour Party acquired power by the 1945 general election, it ignored the draft plan. However, today Labour seems to have revitalized it again.
* Compare this to leading UK voices during the UK initiated Opium war who wanted 'to show the Chinese British civilization'.
While a majority is against increased "defense" spending, BBC does its utmost to change their mind.
US authoritarian Maoism
Empty "democracy"*
* With 1/3 of votes Labour got 2/3 of the parliament - which makes a
vote of censure impossible for at least five years - while delivering
the opposite to voters expectation.
Some ideologists, such as Kingoro Hashimoto, proposed a single-party dictatorship, based on populism, patterned after the European fascist movements. An Investigation of Global Policy with the Yamato Race as Nucleus shows the influence clearly.[13]
These geopolitical ideals developed into the Amau Doctrine (天羽声明, an Asian Monroe Doctrine), stating that Japan assumed total responsibility for peace in Asia, and can be seen later when Prime Minister Kōki Hirota proclaimed justified Japanese expansion into northern China as the creation of "a special zone, anti-communist, pro-Japanese and pro-Manchukuo" that was a "fundamental part" of Japanese national existence.
Poor Brits are forced to pay more for annoying army copters and jets noisy "training" over their heads for wars abroad while getting less welfare and security at home
UK's authoritarian* anti-democratic* dictatorship imposes* warfare state that increases* threats against UK while the welfare state suffers.
* Increases risk of more Saudi sponsored Sunni islamist attacks because of UK's support of Israel's genocide against Palestinians - and possible escalation of the war against Russia to a point where UK itself risks being targeted.
Against the will of the people Starmer chose to spend on risky militaristic meddling in other countries, so to please the world's worst rogue* state US while cutting on welfare.Read how Peter Klevius solved "the biggest mystery in science".
Read Peter Klevius in-depth research on The Psychosocial Freud Timeline.
Read Peter Klevius Origin of the Vikings from 2005 - now again available after Google deleted it 2014 and again in February 2024.
Peter Klevius (1981, 1992): The ultimate question ought to be: What is it like to be a stone? There's no difference between human consciousness polished through living, and the "consciousness" of a stone that has been smoothly shaped in streaming water against other rocks, stones etc. It started its "life" as a rugged piece of rock in a mountain and adapted to its life in streaming water down hill, or perhaps as a piece of rock falling on a beach and polished by waves.