To the left: Depictions of Homo floresiensis alive.
To the right: 1.8 million year old Homo Georgicus (Dmanisi, SE Euorope) compared to Floresiensis (Flores, Indonesia), partly contemporary (98,000 - 12,000 years ago) with modern humans like you & me (from <40,000 years ago to present). Note the different foreheads! If Homo georgicus is seen as a Eurasian advancement of the more primitive African Homo habilis it can also stand as an example for the very same pattern as first described by Klevius 2004, i.e. a repetitive "Out of Africa & back as more advanced" genetic movement fueled by climate changes. However, in the case of Homo floresiensis we may face a direct reflection of a genetic advancement (Pan-Homo hybridization) originating inside Africa & not yet affected by the Eurasian steppe.
The main obstacle for understanding Homo floresiensis may be described as: If small brained ancestors to what is still (incorrectly)assumed to be the lineage of human ancestors, couldn't make/use tools with similar brain size, then Homo floresiensis couldn't do it either.
As Homo floresiensis was discovered (by "Western" scientists) in islamofascist Indonesia it, of course, immediately became the target for not only islamo-religious "scientific" excuses, but also islamofascist anthropogical terror in the form of downright theft & damage of the remains (by the main Indonesian state "anthropologist" Teuku Jacob - see Klevius' previous writings on this embarrassing topic. Sadly this crypto-creationist "scientist" also got stupid "Westerners'" support for his perverted logic).
Indonesia, btw, also harbors Aceh (see Origin of islam, the worst crime ever against humanity), perhaps the first gate for islamic slavery evilness in SE Asia. Just like in East Africa islam spread its parasitic slave raid/trade tentacles (i.e. the original islamic finance) through a network of lower class "half-muslims" all the way to the fully infidels. Btw, who wants/dare to support/publish Klevius book A Roots Guide - a key to ethnic liberation from islam (to you morons* who say islam is part of ethnicity, please think again. When I, as a 14 year old, definitely abandoned any ties to "monogodisms" I used to say that the only difference between me & Kierkegaard was that he was monogodist religious - Klevius Definition of religion. The "Christian heritage" nonsense is nothing but empty religious propaganda)?
* "morons" because I can't believe they are that dumb, but rather that they deliberately hide their intellect in the sand! There's a huge difference between an open search for truth or an in advance closed search for amplified bias.
For you who have abandoned Freud's, Chomsky's & others stupidities & who want to get a better insight in how the human (& animal) mind really works go to EMAH (the Even More Astonishing Hypothesis).
Background
The human mtDNA "originates" in two branches (called Eve & Adam – which naming is equally misleading, stupid & influenced by “godisms” as is the “Big Bang”*) the female starting some >140,000 years ago & the male some >60,000 years ago. However, this pattern may be better described in terms of speciation through hybridization.
* Where did it "bang"?! Creation from nothing is a typical Mideast "monogodist" stupidity, the very opposite to creation from something, as is the usual logic in other creation myths (see Klevius 1992:22, Demand for Resources).
We do know that so called parallel evolution in primates has been common. We also know that fertile hybridization is possible between species genetically more distant than humans & chimp.
Lucy (an australopithecine >3 myr old, with small stature & similar brain size, who is supposed to be a human ancestor but who wasn't even close to Floresiensis tool making/usage skills - Floresiensis' stone tools include types previously only found together with Homo sapiens at Stone Age sites) has a sacrum that fits the pelvis of Floresiensis. The femur has a small head & long neck like both australopithecines and Homo habilis & the pelvis resembles australopithecines (please note that these distinctions aren't complete simply due to the lack of bones).
Floresiensis' wrist (trapezoid bone) resambles that of great apes and early hominids but unlike that of Neanderthals and modern humans.
Floresiensis some 400 cc brain is less than one-third of the average modern human & has, by some anthropologists (especially by Islamic or other "godist" "scientists" or their supporters) beem seen as "too small" to fit anything previously known about human brain evolution and too small to have been derived from Homo erectus by evolutionary dwarfing.
The ridicilous claim that Floresiensis had visited a dentist has long since been refuted & belongs to the same category of desperate excuses for a finding that disturbs fanatic "godists" & their supporters (unless they are just examples of plainly dumb "scientists" that have inflated science through our university system which doesn't filter out such "scientific" morons).
Conclusion
According to Morwood, Floresiensis' diminutive stature, long arms, and nearly chimp-size brain resemble australopithecines who lived >2 million years ago. The (Homo) Floresiensis hence may have evolved from an unknown Asian australopithecine.
Solution
Klevius comment: In line with the facts above & my Out of Africa as pygmies & back as global "mongoloids" theory, a more plausible explanation would be a late but fertile chimp-human hybridization in Africa which then spread & intermingled (e.g. via African human pygmies, Negritos etc) with big-headed but stupid Homos with less sophisticated brains, except for in some refuges where original (or close to original) "floresiensis" populations eventually got extinct. I.e. when the "new" brain was genetically poured into Homo skulls the overall IQ exploded & created the real global human.
The Hanumans?
An intriguing possibility, as indicated by Klevius three years ago, is that the M130 lineage is associated with Homo floresiensis. The possible scenario according to Klevius: Homo floresiensis came out of Africa as a result of chimp-human hybridization >100,000 years ago. At a later stage a more advanced form evolved and spread as M130. These people may have looked like a mix of human pygmies & Homo floresiensis resulting in what Ibn Battuta described as "mastiff-like people".
KLEVUX, your best (& in the case of sex segregation & islam, the only one so far) source for an informed, intelligent & truly interdisciplinary analysis on the net. Btw, did you know that humans aren't genetically improving their intelligence anymore? Contrary to what you are told students aren't more but probably less intelligent today than before (e.g. lack of niches). What has been measured isn't intelligence but cultural changes, e.g. that many more students than ever before are now prepared for an educational type of IQ test. I.e. an inflation in IQ testing. Also remember Klevius' analysis of intelligence in Demand for Resources (1992): "To understand the real nature of IQ-tests you may just consider mirroring them by making, instead of solving, IQ-tests.
So who wants to support or publish A Roots Guide - Out of Africa, Asia, & Europe as slaves, Klevius new book tracing ethnic origin through islamic/Koranic slavery? An astonishing analysis which really explores & reveals the full enormity of the connection between the birth of islam, Koran & 1400 years of an all time ongoing small & big scale slavery/rapetivism/genocide jihad. A final blow to those who try to excuse islam and/or lump islam together with other religions in this respect. You know, the old but pointless trick saying "Christians & Jews also had/took/sold slaves"! Go e.g. to Origin of Vikings & islam & press "Make a donation"!
