Were PM Sanna Marin and President Sauli Niinistö complicit to the Russian invasion of Ukraine as a crime of aggression, under which politicians and leaders can be held individually responsible for invasions and other major attacks - at least morally if not judicially, other than as likely corruption? After all, the circumstantial evidence are overwhelming. At a point in late 2021 PM Sanna Marin and President Sauli Niinistö, against the will of the Finnish people, suddenly decided to buy 64 mini nuke (B61 12) carrying F-35 instead of the Swedish plane as was planned. And around the same time late 2021 PM Sanna Marin and President Sauli Niinistö also decided to join NATO, i.e. not only breaking with neutrality but also acting exactly in favour of militaristic and war mongering dollar freeloader (2021-) US and exactly against Russia and its security concerns. And Russia probably attacked Ukraine (which since 2014 had committed genocide against its Russian population) as to avoid NATO (i.e. US nukes) in Ukraine as well as a warning to the Finnish people not to abandon neutrality. How did this happen? is a question the Finnish people should ask itself in the name of democracy, because without invasion they wouldn't have changed their mind.
The
Defense Cooperation Agreement (DCA) will provide a framework and legal
basis for U.S. forces to obtain nuke etc. entry into the country and the
use of facilities to conduct activities for US attacks from inside
other countries.
Peter Klevius warning to any US "ally" - read history!
Even
BBC sounded almost perplex when it realized that US uses UK land for US
nukes which US solely controls. But Peter Klevius asks: Why surprised?!
After all, little US' puppet UK hasn't as yet realized the new world
order which eminates from China's technological success, which
dollar-freeloader US painfully has, and therefore desperately tries to
both eat the cake while keeping it, by trying to contain China from
others while itself benefiting from China. US will abandon its former
enemy UK at any point US feels it's more benefocoal - and those points
are alredy gathering.
Spineless former Finnish PM Sanna Marin exemplifies the "the young leader syndrome".
Sanna
Marin, who called China an "enemy of Finland" and talked about Human
Rights, also promised that she wouldn't go international if she lost the
election. She lost and is now hired by the Tony Blair Institute for
Global Change, which is supported by and works for the murderous war
criminal and Human Rights violater the Saudi dictator MBS in his
Saudi
Vision 2030 program which is intimately connected to China's Belt and
Road Initiative becaus China is now the indisputable world leader in
high tech and science - and Huawei has its largest overseas technology
experience center in Riyadh.
According to a statement
published by the Finnish government at the time, negotiations about the
Defense Cooperation Agreement are not expected to be completed before
the fall and could go into the new year. Once finalized, the DCA will be
submitted to the Finnish parliament for approval. Do not expect much
pushback from decision-makers regarding the endorsement of this evil
deal unless the public is better informed about its background.
Finland
behaves like a delusional childish madman in its ignorant total
submission under the criminal and war mongering dollar-freeloader
(1971-) US which is doomed to rottening anyway and will pull its
"alliesW with it in its decay!
Peter Klevius is an expert on
those stupid Finnish emotions because he knows them at every bit because
he masters not only all Nordic and Finnish languages but also the inner
core of the Finnish cultural mentality. This is why Peter Klevius for
20 years has pointed out and warned about the disastrous Finnish "mongol
complex".
Before and during the opium wars China didn't rest on
piracy (aka colonialism) as did Western countries which specialized in
militaristic robbery around the world. When the ultra sophisticated
Chinese civilization produced world leading consumer products, Western
piracy powers produced weapons, piracy ships - imperialist colonialism
in the name of "god".
Peter Klevius wrote:
Finland signs a deal with the Devil - choosing militarism and disaster instead of peace and prosperity?!
The Finnish "mongol complex" Peter Klevius wrote about 20 years ago is now taking Finland down the wrong path!
The
Finnish licking of the criminal US ass has a long background in
Finland's history in the shadow of Russia and Finland's disastrous
alliance with the Nazis, but also because of the racist "mongol complex"
which started after US' 1917 hate laws against Chinese (the Yellow
Peril), and the import of poor Chinese slave workers from Stalin's
Soviet to Finland. These poor Chinese prisoners situation was even worse
than the poor slaves in the US because the Chinese were even robbed of
their family and kinship ties. However, the Chinese slaves also looked
different than the average Finns - but did resemble the much hated Sami
people. The US former slaves at least had same looking wealthy people as
well in the same country.
US' dollar theft 1971- has made US a
dangerous rouge state - especially now because of China's rise. It means
disaster (even without any war) for Finlad to let itself be lured by US
into a position exactly opposite to what would be goog for Finland. The
only right thing to do would have been opening up for trading with the
capitalist modern China which has a successful political system based on
meritocracy which democratically (i.e. measured by the will of the
people) outperforms every country inside US' Western hegemony. Moreover,
because of China's accelerating R&D lead it will soon be very
obvious for people that befriending a criminal loser only hurts in the
not so long run.
When US on the brink of bankruptcy in 1971
started stealing feom the rest of the world by instead og paying its
debts, US started robbing the world with a dollar hegemony - i.e. by
disconnecting the dollar from all other currencies and having a
non-democratic institution (Fed) printing dollar with impunity. In other
words, US became the only country in the world that could survive with a
massive debt and constant trade deficit - because the deficit wasn't
paid by US but instead spread all over the rest of the world via the
dollar hegemony to pay for US criminal wellbeing!
To like the
U.S. Congress without the slightest evidence against China's leadership
but only because it dislikes China's success, "suspecting" the
leadership of modern capitalist and meritocratic China of doing anything
with Tik Tok that even comes close to what the U.S. is now doing with
U.S.-based platforms worldwide, is not only the height of hypocrisy but
incredibly dangerous given how the dollar thief U.S. (1971-) is
currently manipulating the entire West. No, there is no good U.S.
anymore just because of 1971 - but there are lots of good U.S. people,
albeit not as many as good Chinese people proportionally, precisely
because of 1971.
England and the United States are now also
sending nuclear weapons to Ukraine. Depleted uranium in projectiles is
nuclear weapons because the definition of nuclear weapons is that the
purpose of the nuclear matter is not contamination but instead the extra
force that is achieved compared to conventional projectiles. In other
words,
Peter Klevius wouldn't at all be surprised if the Ukraine
civil war which was originally meddled, instigated and incited by US'
support for the genocide against Russians in Ukraine from 2013 and on,
would end with Ukraine opening up for China and thereby prospering ahead
of Finland in the near future!
Shouldn't
the ICC puppet clowns instead take a good look at US criminal behavior
as well as against those politicians who lured the Finns into the
Devil's mouth!
Peter Klevius wrote:
This year Peter Klevius cannot congratulate Finland on its traditional
Independence Day because it's not neutral and independent any more.
And as US/CIA raped Finland with
militaristic NATO (i.e. US) and US nukes (F-35 with s.c. mini-nukes), so
does Finland rape the demilitarized Åland.
Finland's
PM Sanna Marin warns (on order from US?!) countries to not trade with
China – New Zealand’s largest trading partner. “We will see in the
future that technologies and the digital environment will only be more
in our societies than now, and we have to make sure that we don't have
that kind of dependencies that becomes vulnerabilities and risks that
will come to realise.
Peter Klevisu: Right! Stop your dependancy of the financial- and war-criminal US!
Peter Klevius to Sanna Marin: Are you dumb or corrupt?! If the former then you may benefit from these facts:
1.
Everything that - since China surpassed US in economy and technology -
now comes out from Uncle Sam's rottening mouth is the wording of a
desperado who doesn't see any way out of its own criminal dollar
counterfeiting (since 1971) other than trying to harm the challenger by
using US financial and militaristic global hegemony and monopoly - and
stupid poiticians of its "allies"/puppets!
2. According to
several US made research the leadership in modern China has by far the
best approval rating from its people compared to other technologically
advanced countries. And it has nothing in common with North Korea but
everyting with US' "ally" Vietnam (which is tiny and much less
technologically advanced than China) when it comes to politics and
government.
3. Chinese leadership has been by far the most
successful when it comes to lifting people out of poverty and improving
infra-structure, both at home and worldwide.
4. China has a privacy law that is equal to that of EU but makes US look like a Medieval dictatorship in comparison.
5.
Islam's biggest and most important global organization OIC carefully
inspected the alleged "Human Rights violations" and "genocide" against
Uyghur muslims, and not only declared them totally unfounded but also
credited the Chinese leadership for its treatment of muslims in China.
6.
China has been most successful in handling Covid by offering (not
commanding) a real vaccine to its people, and especially to those
elderly who are vulnerable. That many elderly have been reluctant to
take it has to do with Chinese traditions and suspicions due to the
vaccine scandals in the West. And the reason the Chinese leadership
didn't enforce vaccination was precisely because of the old Confucian
tradition of respect for the elderly - which we in the West seem to have
abandoned. The rigid Chinese lockdown was the will of Chinese people -
not the "Communist dictatorship" as US/CIA steered media want us to
believe. Against this background it's pathetic that Finland kicks out
Confucian institutes because US ordered it to do so, but has no problem
with islamist mosques and institutes paid by the islamofascist Saudi
dictator family. And to top it all, now China, as the first country in
the world, has developed a recombinant human monoclonal antibody vaccine
that fully protects against all variants; uses own human antibody
cells; has no side-effects; is cheaper then Western vaccines; and can be
taken as a nasal spray - i.e. directed precisely to the first barrier
of defense, which then goes farther and kills the virus already in the
lungs.
7. China, according to US research, is now by far the
world leader when it comes to R&D. Abandoning ties with China will
inevitably lead any country incl. Finland into backwardness in the near
future.
8. The only way for US to stop China from developing even
further and faster is to start a war. That's why US makes every effort
to subvert Taiwan-China and mainland-China ties, by supporting the the
anti-China party against the pro-China party in Taiwan, as well as
militarizing Taiwan itself and the whole of the East Asian territory,
and even pushing for NATO extension against China. Do you Snna Marin
want to support Uncle Sam's own criminal interests and starting one more
war initiated by US?!
9. So dear Sanna, why did you choose Uncle Sam's nukes while abandoning China?!
And
the alleged "authoritarian censorship" in China pales in comparison
with the West, and should also be seen against the background of
US/CIA's continuous efforts to subvert and destabilize China. Moreover,
see how US and its puppets brutally faked and distorted information
about the opthomologist doctor in Wuhan who wrongly put on the Chinese
social media Weibu that Covid-19 was the much more dangerous original
SARS virus. After an hour he realized his mistake, and according to the
law (as in all Western countries) spreading such possibly dangerous
rumors made it necessary for the hospital to report it to authorities.
However, after a couple of days the police just asked him to explain and
then told him not to do it again. And after that he could in peace
continue his work at the hospital without any kind of sentence or fine
etc. So how does this fact as well as the fact that he could say
whatever he liked on Weibu fit an "authoritarian dictatorship"?! But in
the West he was "a suppressed whisteblower silenced by the Communist
dictaorship". Similarly, when the unhealthy and dement former Chinese
leader Hu Jintao got worse during the long lasting congress and was
helped out, the Western media and especially BBC, desperately tried to
make readers and listeners belive the poor man was "silenced" by the
"dictator" Xi. Same story with the mentally ill "whistleblower" woman,
and the "batwoman" etc. etc. the list could go on.
Peter Klevius wrote:
Finnish politicians and "experts" lie about US' NATO nukes straight in the face of the Finnish people.
When Newsweek rightly pointed out that
'Finland May* Allow NATO to Place Nuclear Weapons on Border With Russia'
it just repeated what Peter Klevius warned for almost a year ago when
Finnish politicians made the disastrous NATO decision without asking the
Finns.
*
In fact it's inevitable that if Finland really goes through with this,
then the road for US nukes is wide open, no matter if the nukes are
physically there before a conflict or not.
Peter
Klevius translation: American (sic) magazine reported about Finland and
nukes - Aaltola and Stubb snarled: 'Humbug' (this was in regard of
Newsweek's article - which isn't "American" but a U.S. magazine).
At
the heart of US' aggressive nuke policy is the B61-12 Life Extension
Program with s.c. low-yield (Hiroshima+ size) ground penetrating nuclear
warheads, tailored for stealth attacks with F-35b departing from
countries close to Russian or Chinese borders.
According to the
Helsinki-based newspaper Iltalehti, the bill regarding potential NATO
membership the Finnish government will put before parliament doesn't
include any opt-outs for nuclear weapons.
Speaking to the paper,
defense sources said Finland's foreign and defense ministers, Pekka
Haavisto and Antti Kaikkonen, gave a "commitment" to NATO in July that
they wouldn't seek "restrictions or national reservations" if Helsinki's
application is accepted.
However, now the same Iltalehti has the
nerve to call this information a "fake", and pretends to excuse the
move by writing that 'Finland hasn't asked for nukes'. Well, if you sign
with the Devil which clearly wants to utilize your position as a border
against Russia, and which has produced more than 600 "mininukes"
tailored for exactly those 64 F-35 you were cheated to buy instead of
the Swedish ones that had for long been the plan, then only a fool or a
deliberate lier/cheater would argue as Iltalehti does.
Here's Iltalehti's nutty "defense" translated by Peter Klevius:
Iltalehti's
article doesn't argue that NATO plans to bring nukes to Finland. The
article deals with information according which the government's bill
doesn't explicitly prohibit this.
'Iltalehden artikkelissa ei
väitetä Naton suunnittelevan ydinaseiden tuomista Suomeen. Artikkeli
käsittelee tietoja, joiden mukaan hallituksen lakiesitys ei erikseen
kiellä tätä.'
Peter Klevius: I rest my case! Rest in US nukes, Finland!
Peter Klevius wrote:
Why did Finland suddenly jump for F35 instead of (as planned) Swedish Gripen? Because Gripen can't carry US new mini nukes!
How stupid and dangerous can Finnish politicians be who try to push Finland into US extended nuke army (i.e. NATO)!
US is 100% to blame for the Ukraine disaster as well.
STOP US (+ its Anglospheric puppets), the worst threat to the world right now!
This monstrous rogue state $-freeloading U.S.:
1. Is adding more than 600 nukes to its already more than 6,000.
Because of smaller size, better transportability, higher accuracy,
and US first strike policy (unlike e.g. Russia, China etc.)
the risk of use of nukes by US has dramatically increased
- especially considering the end of $-hegemony because of China
outperforming it in tech and healthy development.
2. US can at any time read and silence your free speech, or stop your
transaction - wherever you are in the world (except in China).
3. UK/AUKUS bought US mini nukes (e.g. for Trident) and NATO+Finland bought
F35 which can carry them.
Peter Klevius wrote:
Shame on you Finland! Why risk yourself and others by defending a
criminal* loser** like $-freeloader US (unless US causes a nuke war)
against a certain winner like China?!
* 1971 USA robbed the world by
cheating on its promise to keep the dollar connected to gold in exchange
for the dollar being the world currency. In other words, all other
currencies dropped compared to the dollar which now became a
"schizophrenic" currency with an A-dollar in US and a B-dollar in all
other countries. And although every country may print as much own
currency they like, it comes with a cost it has to carry itself while
the US dollar printing is paid for by the rest of the world. Only
inflation is a risk for US - but not as much as outside US (except
China).
** US has already lost its position as the largest
economy to China, and is also fast losing in every high tech branch and
science - while China is on its way up. This is why US so desperately
tries to contain China and force other countries under US rule against
China. However, ask youself which is better: Belt and road or nukes?
F-35A + B61-12 + NATO makes Finland a U.S. base for nuke threat/attacks against Russia - and ultimately China!
The
Finns are now lured into NATO when the West is collapsing. A
combination of US influence and a longlasting Finnish mongoloid complex
that they weren't Western enough. Finnish Russophobia started with the
grim Finnish civil war 2018 influenced by the US led Red Scare campaign
which is the promotion of a widespread fear of a potential rise of
communism, anarchism or other leftist ideologies by a society or state.
It is often characterized as political propaganda. The term is most
often used to refer to two periods in the history of the United States
which are referred to by this name. The First Red Scare, which occurred
immediately after World War I, revolved around a perceived threat from
the American labor movement, anarchist revolution, and political
radicalism. The Second Red Scare, which occurred immediately after World
War II, was preoccupied with the perception that national or foreign
communists were infiltrating or subverting U.S. society and the federal
government.
North Atlantic Aliance is turning into US' South and East China Sea Sinophobia alliance.
How
many Finns were aware of US true motives for pushing Finland into US
militarism and nuke sphere for the ultimate aim to act as one tiny and
helpless piece in US strategic and tactical containment of and attack on
China? And how US uses its influence to corrupt politicians to betray
their country and democracy.
Finland's young PM Sanna Marin rose to power thanks to US led/influenced World Economic Forum's "Young leaders" program.
A
former Finnish PM Alexander Stubb celebrates that his long time wish
for a Finnish NATO membership now comes true thanks to Russian invasion
of Ukraine.
Peter Klevius wonders whether this was exactly what the US administartion also wanted - and even planned for.
Finns are thoroughly brainwashed with US narrative while completely locked out from alternative narratives.It
looks like US has been mostly interested in arms race and miltary,
financial etc. evil meddling in Europe while Russia's main interest has
been to sell cheap gas to Europe.
A Norwegian intelligence report
points to three reasons why Russia feels threatened, making the
country’s nuclear deterrence more important.
Firstly, Russia
claims NATO has changed patterns from normal patrols and intelligence
gatherings to simulated attacks on Russian targets, including with
strategic bombers. Part of the Russian narrative is that NATO is coming
closer to its borders.
Secondly, Moscow accuses NATO of
introducing new areas of warfare, like the use of digital operations and
militarization of the space, potentially being used to attack Russian
ballistic missiles before launch.
Thirdly, Russia blames the
United States for undermining the global security balance and arms
control treaties, by that pushing the world towards a new nuclear arms
race.
After all, US isn't interested in "defending" Europe.
US' main and only goal is to (again) attack and eliminste China becaus
US dollar scum is coming home to roost any day now because of China's
succes. US managed to keep a stagnating Japan at bay with the help of EU
in the 1990s. However, China is some ten times bigger and growing.
Chinese
slave workers were brought to Finland from Russia some 100 years ago.
They became part of the Finnish mongolid/russophobia racist complex.
Chinese slave workers brought to Finland via Russia.
Peter Klevius wrote 2003:
The Finnish/Swedish/European Mongoloid-complex
http://klevius.info/mongol.html?1076242540617
In
1952, only seven years after the end of Finland's disastrous connection
with Germany in the World War 2, apart from having its first Olympics
the nation celebrated the 17-year old Armi Kuusela's victory in the Miss
Universe "beauty" contest, thus finally releasing the Finns from what
was considered a traumatic connection with the East and its
Russian/mongoloid inhabitants.
Interestingly enough it seems that
the Finns express the most mongolic genetic profile of the Europeans.
On the other hand especially eastern Finns tend to be more blond, more
blue-eyed and to have the lightest skin color of all! Could that very
fact be an effect of precisely that blend/traits from northern mongoloid
people? I.e. that the most admired of "Nordic" features were inherited
from the most unwanted direction? That the genetic blend happened to be
especially sensitive to poor light conditions/folic acid intake etc.,
i.e. as an extra addition to the general impact of farming.
Also check out the Finnish "TAT"-controversy!
The
Sami population inhabits an area (in Russia, Finland, Sweden and
Norway) that is approximately the size of the entire Sweden (within
Sweden about half the size of the country).
When the Swedish
Prime Minister Göran Persson in 2004 held a conference on genocide, the
only media that reported about the Sami protests against the decision
not to include the native Swedes, seems to have been the Sami News.
Soft
Genocide in Sweden (apart from the soft genocide executed by the
Swedish legislator and the social authorities etc in matters of
children).
Peter Klevius wrote:
Finland-Swedish Peter Klevius exhibits the art of the Finland-Swedish
artist Hugo Simberg, calling it The Rape of Finland and Åland
Peter Klevius feels that Hugo Simberg
would have 100% approved of this 2023 art exhibition on the web as a
follow up to his 1903 exhibition of the 'Wounded Angel' at Ateneum
(Helsingfors) - where Peter Klevius would have no access today
Read how climate change made human evolution possible in SE Asian volatile archipelago - not on a continent like Africa.
Read how
two craniopagus twins born 2006 solved the "greatest mystery in
science" - and proved Peter Klevius theory from 1992-94 100% correct.
More than a century after Hugo Simberg painted the The Wounded Angel, it was voted Finland's "national painting" in 2006.
The Garden of Death by Hugo Simberg - updated by Peter Klevius.
The
main problem for Finland (and other US puppets) is that US is now a
dangerous losing criminal due to its dollar theft 1971- coming home to
roost thanks to Cina's success, and that China surpasses US in all tech
categories - which means that hanging on to US hegemony inevitably means
retarding in technology, wealth, and security.
To understand the
civil war in Ukraine you need to understand how US managed to
reintroduce fascism in Europe, and how this has made it possible for US
controlled media to support what it previously used to attack, and to
attack what it previously used to support. What would normally be called
neo-fascism, neo-nazism and genocide is now called "heroic", and
liberation from state terror and oppression is now called crime of
aggression.
A reaal genocide in Ukraine
backed by US is dismissed while China's treatment of muslims is
applauded by OIC (muslims' world organization) but declared "genocide"
by US and its puppets!
The Neo-Nazi Question in Ukraine
The
real problem is actually the administration's over-engagement in this
case -- as in meddling in the affairs of another state and trying to
rearrange its domestic political machinery to suit Washington's agenda.
By Michael Hughes, Contributor
Foreign Policy Analyst
Mar 11, 2014, 12:44 AM EDT
|
Updated May 11, 2014
This
post was published on the now-closed HuffPost Contributor platform.
Contributors control their own work and posted freely to our site. If
you need to flag this entry as abusive, send us an email.
The
Obama administration has vehemently denied charges that Ukraine's
nascent regime is stock full of neo-fascists despite clear evidence
suggesting otherwise. Such categorical repudiations lend credence to the
notion the U.S. facilitated the anti-Russian cabal's rise to power as
part of a broader strategy to draw Ukraine into the West's sphere of
influence. Even more disturbing are apologists, from the American left
and right, who seem willing accomplices in this obfuscation of reality,
when just a cursory glance at the profiles of Ukraine's new leaders
should give pause to the most zealous of Russophobes.
In a State
Department "fact sheet" released last week the U.S. accused Putin of
lying about the Ukrainian government being under the sway of extremist
elements. The report stated that right wing ultranationalist groups "are
not represented in the Rada (Ukraine's parliament)," and that "there is
no indication the government would pursue discriminatory policies."
It
isn't too surprising that conservative outlets like FOX News would
downplay Russian allegations but the so-called "liberal" press has also
contributed to the American disinformation campaign. Celestine Bohlen
from The New York Times considers harsh epithets, like the word
"neo-Nazi," which Putin has hurled at the demonstrators in Kiev as part
of a Russian propaganda effort to tarnish Ukraine's revolutionary
struggle against authoritarianism.
Yet after simply Googling the
terms "Ukraine" and "Neo-Nazi," the official position of the United
States government along with the stance taken by many in the American
media both now seem quite dubious, if not downright ridiculous,
especially considering that one would be hard-pressed to machinate the
lineup that now dominates Ukraine's ministry posts.
For starters,
Andriy Parubiy, the new secretary of Ukraine's security council, was a
co-founder of the Neo-Nazi Social-National Party of Ukraine (SNPU),
otherwise known as Svoboda. And his deputy, Dmytro Yarosh, is the leader
of a party called the Right Sector which, according to historian
Timothy Stanley, "flies the old flag of the Ukrainian Nazi collaborators
at its rallies."
The highest-ranking right-wing extremist is
Deputy Prime Minister Oleksandr Sych, also a member of Svoboda, who
believes that women should "lead the kind of lifestyle to avoid the risk
of rape, including refraining from drinking alcohol and being in
controversial company." This is the philosophy underlying one of his
"legal initiatives," according to the Kyiv Post, "to ban all abortions,
even for pregnancies that occurred during rape."
The Svoboda
party has tapped into Nazi symbolism including the "wolf's angel" rune,
which resembles a swastika and was worn by members of the Waffen-SS, a
panzer division that was declared a criminal organization at Nuremberg. A
report from Tel-Aviv University describes the Svoboda party as "an
extremist, right-wing, nationalist organization which emphasizes its
identification with the ideology of German National Socialism."
According
to this BBC news clip two Svoboda parliamentarians in recent weeks
posed for photos while "brandishing well-known far right numerology,"
including the numbers 88 -- the eighth letter of the alphabet --
signifying "HH," as in "Heil Hitler." This all makes Hillary Clinton's
recent comments comparing Putin to Hitler appear patently absurd, as
Stanley adeptly points out: "After all, in the eyes of many ethnic
Russians, it is the Ukrainian nationalists -- not Putin -- who are the
Nazis."
Last week Per Anders Rudling from Lund University in
Sweden, an expert on Ukrainian extremists, told Britain's Channel 4
News: "A neo-fascist party like Svoboda getting the deputy prime
minister position is news in its own right." Well, except in the U.S.
Even
more disconcerting has been the emergence of phone intercepts between
high-ranking U.S. and Ukrainian officials which make it look as if the
U.S. was basically, in the words of Princeton's Stephen Cohen, "plotting
a coup d'état against the elected president of Ukraine." In other
words, the U.S., in addition to providing moral support, may have paved
the way for extremists to seize power in Kiev. Such a development would
counter the American right's condemnation of Obama for not "engaging" in
the world. The real problem is actually the administration's
over-engagement in this case -- as in meddling in the affairs of another
state and trying to rearrange its domestic political machinery to suit
Washington's agenda.
This gambit has backfired in a number of
ways. Not only has a neo-fascist-laden regime secured power in Kiev but
it may have played the U.S. and its allies for fools by insinuating it
would become part of the Western sphere when it really had no such
designs. As Svoboda political council member Yury Noyevy baldly
admitted: "The participation of Ukrainian nationalism and Svoboda in the
process of EU [European Union] integration is a means to break our ties
with Russia."
Be they radical mujahideen or neo-fascists,
Washington certainly has a penchant for bolstering shadowy forces,
usually labeling them with risible euphemisms like "freedom fighters,"
in order to satiate short-term geopolitical needs, despite said factions
being inimical to America's true long-term interests.
It's not Russia that's pushed Ukraine to the brink of war
This article is more than 9 years old
Seumas Milne
The
attempt to lever Kiev into the western camp by ousting an elected
leader made conflict certain. It could be a threat to us all
Wed 30 Apr 2014 21.01 BST
The
threat of war in Ukraine is growing. As the unelected government in
Kiev declares itself unable to control the rebellion in the country's
east, John Kerry brands Russia a rogue state. The US and the European
Union step up sanctions against the Kremlin, accusing it of
destabilising Ukraine. The White House is reported to be set on a new
cold war policy with the aim of turning Russia into a "pariah state".
That
might be more explicable if what is going on in eastern Ukraine now
were not the mirror image of what took place in Kiev a couple of months
ago. Then, it was armed protesters in Maidan Square seizing government
buildings and demanding a change of government and constitution. US and
European leaders championed the "masked militants" and denounced the
elected government for its crackdown, just as they now back the
unelected government's use of force against rebels occupying police
stations and town halls in cities such as Slavyansk and Donetsk.
"America
is with you," Senator John McCain told demonstrators then, standing
shoulder to shoulder with the leader of the far-right Svoboda party as
the US ambassador haggled with the state department over who would make
up the new Ukrainian government.
When the Ukrainian president was
replaced by a US-selected administration, in an entirely
unconstitutional takeover, politicians such as William Hague brazenly
misled parliament about the legality of what had taken place: the
imposition of a pro-western government on Russia's most neuralgic and
politically divided neighbour.
Putin bit back, taking a leaf out
of the US street-protest playbook – even though, as in Kiev, the
protests that spread from Crimea to eastern Ukraine evidently have mass
support. But what had been a glorious cry for freedom in Kiev became
infiltration and insatiable aggression in Sevastopol and Luhansk.
After
Crimeans voted overwhelmingly to join Russia, the bulk of the western
media abandoned any hint of even-handed coverage. So Putin is now
routinely compared to Hitler, while the role of the fascistic right on
the streets and in the new Ukrainian regime has been airbrushed out of
most reporting as Putinist propaganda.
So you don't hear much
about the Ukrainian government's veneration of wartime Nazi
collaborators and pogromists, or the arson attacks on the homes and
offices of elected communist leaders, or the integration of the extreme
Right Sector into the national guard, while the anti-semitism and white
supremacism of the government's ultra-nationalists is assiduously played
down, and false identifications of Russian special forces are relayed
as fact.
The reality is that, after two decades of eastward Nato
expansion, this crisis was triggered by the west's attempt to pull
Ukraine decisively into its orbit and defence structure, via an
explicitly anti-Moscow EU association agreement. Its rejection led to
the Maidan protests and the installation of an anti-Russian
administration – rejected by half the country – that went on to sign the
EU and International Monetary Fund agreements regardless.
No
Russian government could have acquiesced in such a threat from territory
that was at the heart of both Russia and the Soviet Union. Putin's
absorption of Crimea and support for the rebellion in eastern Ukraine is
clearly defensive, and the red line now drawn: the east of Ukraine, at
least, is not going to be swallowed up by Nato or the EU.
But the
dangers are also multiplying. Ukraine has shown itself to be barely a
functioning state: the former government was unable to clear Maidan, and
the western-backed regime is "helpless" against the protests in the
Soviet-nostalgic industrial east. For all the talk about the
paramilitary "green men" (who turn out to be overwhelmingly Ukrainian),
the rebellion also has strong social and democratic demands: who would
argue against a referendum on autonomy and elected governors?
Meanwhile,
the US and its European allies impose sanctions and dictate terms to
Russia and its proteges in Kiev, encouraging the military crackdown on
protesters after visits from Joe Biden and the CIA director, John
Brennan. But by what right is the US involved at all, incorporating
under its strategic umbrella a state that has never been a member of
Nato, and whose last elected government came to power on a platform of
explicit neutrality? It has none, of course – which is why the Ukraine
crisis is seen in such a different light across most of the world. There
may be few global takers for Putin's oligarchic conservatism and
nationalism, but Russia's counterweight to US imperial expansion is
welcomed, from China to Brazil.
In fact, one outcome of the
crisis is likely to be a closer alliance between China and Russia, as
the US continues its anti-Chinese "pivot" to Asia. And despite growing
violence, the cost in lives of Russia's arms-length involvement in
Ukraine has so far been minimal compared with any significant western
intervention you care to think of for decades.
The risk of civil
war is nevertheless growing, and with it the chances of outside powers
being drawn into the conflict. Barack Obama has already sent token
forces to eastern Europe and is under pressure, both from Republicans
and Nato hawks such as Poland, to send many more. Both US and British
troops are due to take part in Nato military exercises in Ukraine this
summer.
The US and EU have already overplayed their hand in
Ukraine. Neither Russia nor the western powers may want to intervene
directly, and the Ukrainian prime minister's conjuring up of a third
world war presumably isn't authorised by his Washington sponsors. But a
century after 1914, the risk of unintended consequences should be
obvious enough – as the threat of a return of big-power conflict grows.
Pressure for a negotiated end to the crisis is essential.
Zach Dorfman·National Security Correspondent
January 13, 2022·7 min read
The
CIA is overseeing a secret intensive training program in the U.S. for
elite Ukrainian special operations forces and other intelligence
personnel, according to five former intelligence and national security
officials familiar with the initiative. The program, which started in
2015, is based at an undisclosed facility in the Southern U.S.,
according to some of those officials.
The CIA-trained forces
could soon play a critical role on Ukraine’s eastern border, where
Russian troops have massed in what many fear is preparation for an
invasion. The U.S. and Russia started security talks earlier this week
in Geneva but have failed thus far to reach any concrete agreement.
Ukrainian
Military Forces servicemen walk on a trench on the frontline with
Russia-backed separatists near to Avdiivka, Donetsk, southeastern
Ukraine.
Ukrainian troops walk in a trench on the frontline with
Russia-backed separatists near Avdiivka, Donetsk, southeastern Ukraine,
on Jan. 8. (Anatolii Stepanov/AFP via Getty Images)
While the
covert program, run by paramilitaries working for the CIA’s Ground
Branch — now officially known as Ground Department — was established by
the Obama administration after Russia’s invasion and annexation of
Crimea in 2014, and expanded under the Trump administration, the Biden
administration has further augmented it, said a former senior
intelligence official in touch with colleagues in government.
By
2015, as part of this expanded anti-Russia effort, CIA Ground Branch
paramilitaries also started traveling to the front in eastern Ukraine to
advise their counterparts there, according to a half-dozen former
officials.
The multiweek, U.S.-based CIA program has included
training in firearms, camouflage techniques, land navigation, tactics
like “cover and move,” intelligence and other areas, according to former
officials.
How to characterize the program is a matter of
dispute. The U.S. over three presidents has debated whether to provide
military assistance to Ukraine, and how much, with discussions often
focusing on whether that help is offensive or defensive in character.
U.S.
officials deny that the CIA training program is, or was ever,
offensively oriented. “The purpose of the training, and the training
that was delivered, was to assist in the collection of intelligence,”
said a current senior intelligence official.
But just what
intelligence support entails, in the paramilitary context, can be
ambiguous. And how this training will be applied by the Ukrainians may
change rapidly with facts on the ground.
Ukrainian Territorial
Defense Forces, the military reserve of the Ukrainian Armes Forces, take
part in a military exercise near Kiev on December 25, 2021. (Sergei
Supinsky/AFP via Getty Images)
Ukrainian Territorial Defense Forces,
the military reserve of the Ukrainian Armes Forces, take part in a
military exercise near Kiev on December 25, 2021. (Sergei Supinsky/AFP
via Getty Images)
The program has involved “very specific
training on skills that would enhance” the Ukrainians’ “ability to push
back against the Russians,” said the former senior intelligence
official.
The training, which has included “tactical stuff,” is
“going to start looking pretty offensive if Russians invade Ukraine,”
said the former official.
One person familiar with the program
put it more bluntly. “The United States is training an insurgency,” said
a former CIA official, adding that the program has taught the
Ukrainians how “to kill Russians.”
The program, which does not
appear to have ever been formally aimed at preparing for an insurgency,
did include training that could be used for that purpose. Another former
agency official described technical aspects of the program, like
showing Ukrainians how to maintain secure communications behind enemy
lines or in a “hostile intelligence environment” as potential
“stay-behind force training.”
The current senior intelligence official strongly denied that the program was designed in any way “to assist in an insurgency.”
“Suggestions that we have trained an armed insurgency in Ukraine are simply false,” said Tammy Thorp, a CIA spokesperson.
Going
back decades, the CIA has provided limited training to Ukrainian
intelligence units to try and shore up an independent Kyiv and prevent
Russian subversion, but cooperation “ramped up” after the Crimea
invasion, said a former CIA executive.
Militants of the
self-proclaimed Luhansk People's Republic walk at a fighting
position on the line of separation from the Ukrainian armed forces near
the settlement of Frunze in Luhansk Region, Ukraine December 24, 2021.
REUTERS/Alexander Ermochenko
Militants of the self-proclaimed Luhansk
People's Republic walk at a fighting position on the line of separation
from the Ukrainian armed forces near the settlement of Frunze in
Luhansk Region, Ukraine Dec. 24, 2021. (Alexander Ermochenko/Reuters)
The
CIA paramilitaries in Ukraine have “a very small footprint,” said the
former agency executive, and are helping train Ukrainian forces in
“potential critical nodes the Russians may focus on” if Moscow seeks to
push farther into the country.
Though the agency’s paramilitary
resources have been otherwise stretched thin in Afghanistan and on other
counterterrorism missions, the U.S.-based training program has been a
“high priority” for the CIA since its Obama-era inception, said the
former senior intelligence official.
The program did not require,
or receive, a new presidential finding, which is used to authorize
covert action, and has been run under previously existing authorities,
according to former officials.
The Trump administration —
partially at the urging of Congress — later expanded funding for the
initiative, increasing the number of Ukrainian cohorts brought over
yearly to the U.S., according to former officials.
Training
forces that could take part in an insurgency is not the same as actively
supporting an insurgency if one takes place following a Russian
invasion. The Biden administration has reportedly assembled a task force
to determine how the CIA and other U.S. agencies could support a
Ukrainian insurgency, should Russia launch a large-scale incursion.
“If
the Russians invade, those [graduates of the CIA programs] are going to
be your militia, your insurgent leaders,” said the former senior
intelligence official. “We’ve been training these guys now for eight
years. They’re really good fighters. That’s where the agency’s program
could have a serious impact.”
Over the years, the CIA training programs have been “very effective,” said the former CIA executive.
It
has helped “turn the tide,” said the first former CIA official, who
said he or she was briefed that “gains were being made on the
battlefield” as a “direct result” of the program.
Snipers in
camouflage suits during The celebrations on the occasion of the 5th
anniversary of the National Guard of Ukraine, Kyiv, Ukraine. (Maxym
Marusenko/NurPhoto via Getty Images)
Snipers in camouflage suits
during The celebrations on the occasion of the 5th anniversary of the
National Guard of Ukraine, Kyiv, Ukraine. (Maxym Marusenko/NurPhoto via
Getty Images)
Both U.S. and Ukrainian officials believe that
Ukrainian forces will not be able to withstand a large-scale Russian
incursion, according to former U.S. officials. But representatives from
both countries also believe that Russia won’t be able to hold on to new
territory indefinitely because of stiff resistance from Ukrainian
insurgents, according to former officials.
Working so closely
with the Ukrainians has presented unique challenges, according to former
officials. For years, U.S. officials have believed that, because of
Russia’s web of spies within Ukraine’s intelligence services, the
program has very likely been compromised by Moscow.
Senior Trump
administration officials discussed worries about Russian penetration of
the program with their Ukrainian counterparts, according to a former
national security official. The Ukrainians, well aware of the issue,
have tried to vet the U.S.-bound trainees to weed out moles, according
to former officials.
Still, Trump-era National Security Council
officials established a rule not to tell the Ukrainians anything they
weren’t comfortable with the Russians subsequently learning about,
recalled the former national security official.
A small number of
trainees in the earlier U.S.-based cohorts were sent back to Ukraine
for breaking security rules, like possessing unauthorized electronic
devices, according to the first former CIA official.
CIA
officials also believed their trainees were being targeted by the
Russians once they returned to Ukraine. “Russians and traitorous Russian
loyalists within the Ukrainian security services were seeking out
graduates of those classes to assassinate,” said the former CIA
official.
Forensic police experts and military intelligence examine
the wreckage of a car in Kyiv. The commander of Ukraine's
military intelligence special ops unit colonel Maksym Shapoval was
killed by a bomb attached to the bottom of his vehicle in central Kyiv.
(Sergii Kharchenko/Pacific Press/LightRocket via Getty Images)
Forensic
police experts and military intelligence examine the wreckage of a car
in Kyiv. The commander of Ukraine's military intelligence special ops
unit colonel Maksym Shapoval was killed by a bomb attached to the bottom
of his vehicle in central Kyiv. (Sergii Kharchenko/Pacific
Press/LightRocket via Getty Images)
Russian penetration of
Ukrainian intelligence has been a long-standing problem for the CIA,
according to former intelligence officials. For decades, the agency has
tried to work only with special select Ukrainian units — some created at
the agency’s insistence — that have been isolated from the rest of the
country’s intelligence services in order to prevent Russian compromise,
according to former officials.
Even though the CIA assumes some
Russian compromise when working with the Ukrainians, the agency still
believes the training program has been, on balance, highly valuable,
according to former officials.
If the Russians launch a new
invasion, “there’s going to be people who make their life miserable,”
said the former senior intelligence official. The CIA-trained
paramilitaries “will organize the resistance” using the specialized
training they’ve received.
“All that stuff that happened to us in
Afghanistan,” said the former senior intelligence official, “they can
expect to see tha
